Literature DB >> 16499482

Reestablishing an intragastric ethanol self-infusion model in rats.

Tara L Fidler1, Tara W Clews, Christopher L Cunningham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of behavioral models that will reliably produce ethanol intakes in rodents at levels that induce or maintain dependence. The present experiments were designed to reestablish a model that uses passive intragastric (IG) infusion of ethanol to induce tolerance/dependence/withdrawal before allowing rats to self-infuse ethanol intragastrically.
METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were surgically implanted with IG catheters and allowed to recover. During the passive infusion phase (3-6 days), rats in the experimental group were passively infused with 10% (v/v) ethanol (3.3-12.2 g/kg/d). Rats in the control group were not infused. During the self-infusion phase (5-6 days), all rats had access to 2 flavored solutions. Licks on 1 solution were paired with ethanol infusions (20%, v/v) whereas licks on the other solution were unpaired. Experiments differed in the specific passive infusion parameters and in the ethanol intake limit during self-infusion.
RESULTS: Rats in the experimental groups self-infused more ethanol per day (means of 4-7 g/kg/d) than did rats in the control group (means of 0-2.6 g/kg/d). Across all 3 studies, individual total daily intakes exceeded 5 g/kg on 35% of the self-infusion days in ethanol-preexposed rats compared with <1% of the self-infusion days in the control rats. Ethanol-exposed rats also infused a substantially higher percentage (42%) of their total ethanol intake in relatively large bouts (>1.5 g/kg) compared with control rats (<10%). The addition of a daily 6-hour ethanol-free period during the passive infusion phase (in Experiments 2 and 3) led to higher ethanol intakes than in Experiment 1. Results of a control experiment showed that differences between experimental and control groups in Experiments 1 to 3 were a result of ethanol experience and not a general effect of differential infusion experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Relatively short periods of passive IG infusion of ethanol induced levels of ethanol self-infusion in genetically heterogeneous rats that were comparable with drinking intakes previously reported in rats selectively bred for ethanol intake/preference. Although the induction of dependence/withdrawal may have played a role in this outcome, an alternative interpretation is that experimental rats self-infused more ethanol because passive exposure produced tolerance to aversive pharmacological effects that would otherwise limit intake of the paired flavor because of development of conditioned taste aversion. The current findings provide a strong basis for future work designed to identify parametric determinants of this form of self-administration, its sensitivity to genetic influences, and its neurobiological substrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16499482     DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  22 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical studies of alcohol binge drinking.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; R Adron Harris; George F Koob
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Dependence induced increases in intragastric alcohol consumption in mice.

Authors:  Tara L Fidler; Matthew S Powers; Jason J Ramirez; Andrew Crane; Jennifer Mulgrew; Phoebe Smitasin; Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  Naloxone attenuation of ethanol-reinforced operant responding in infant rats in a re-exposure paradigm.

Authors:  Roberto Sebastián Miranda-Morales; Juan Carlos Molina; Norman E Spear; Paula Abate
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Intragastric self-infusion of ethanol in high- and low-drinking mouse genotypes after passive ethanol exposure.

Authors:  T L Fidler; A M Dion; M S Powers; J J Ramirez; J A Mulgrew; P J Smitasin; A T Crane; C L Cunningham
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Genetically correlated effects of selective breeding for high and low methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  J M Wheeler; C Reed; S Burkhart-Kasch; N Li; C L Cunningham; A Janowsky; F H Franken; K M Wiren; J G Hashimoto; A C Scibelli; T J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Assessment of affective and somatic signs of ethanol withdrawal in C57BL/6J mice using a short-term ethanol treatment.

Authors:  E E Perez; M De Biasi
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 7.  Rodent models of genetic contributions to motivation to abuse alcohol.

Authors:  John C Crabbe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2014

8.  Effects of acute withdrawal on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Sarah E Dreumont; Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Neurobiology of alcohol dependence: focus on motivational mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicholas W Gilpin; George F Koob
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2008

10.  Ethanol-mediated operant learning in the infant rat leads to increased ethanol intake during adolescence.

Authors:  Luciano Federico Ponce; Ricardo Marcos Pautassi; Norman E Spear; Juan Carlos Molina
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.