Literature DB >> 16499442

Evaluation of engineered meniscal cartilage constructs based on different scaffold geometries using magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

André A Neves1, Nick Medcalf, Mark Smith, Kevin M Brindle.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy (MRS) were used to evaluate the properties different scaffold geometries for the production of bioartificial meniscal cartilage constructs. Engineered were generated in perfusion bioreactors from mature sheep meniscal fibrochondrocytes,scaffolds cut from a knitted polyethylene therephtalate (PET) fabric, with a distribution of fibers, 50 microm pores and a density of 45 mg/cm(3) (NF scaffolds), and from two versions of this fabric, which included larger pore sizes (1500 x 500 microm(2)) and densities of (sIV scaffolds) and 83 mg/cm(3) (sV scaffolds). MRI methods were used to determine the permeability the constructs to a low molecular weight MR contrast agent and to measure the macroscopic of medium through and around the constructs. These parameters were correlated with measurements of cell growth and cellular energetics. Cell-free sIV scaffolds were 2- and 5-more porous to flow than the empty sV and NF scaffolds, respectively. These scaffolds, after days of cell growth, were also more permeable to an MR contrast agent. sIV scaffolds yielded(n = 9) with higher cellularities (41 +/- 1%) compared with NF (32 +/- 1%, p < 0.0001) and sV (30 +/- 1%, p < 0.0001) and, when normalized to cell numbers, demonstrated proportionally levels of nucleoside triphosphates (NTP), indicating increased cell viability. Scaffold geometry a marked effect on the properties of engineered meniscal cartilage. MRI and MRS are powerful techniques that can be used to optimize the design of engineered meniscal cartilage and that could be used subsequently to evaluate clinical outcome postimplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16499442     DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng        ISSN: 1076-3279


  5 in total

1.  Label-free magnetic resonance imaging to locate live cells in three-dimensional porous scaffolds.

Authors:  A Abarrategi; M E Fernandez-Valle; T Desmet; D Castejón; A Civantos; C Moreno-Vicente; V Ramos; J V Sanz-Casado; F J Martínez-Vázquez; P Dubruel; P Miranda; J L López-Lacomba
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Use of a genetically engineered protein for the design of a multivalent MRI contrast agent.

Authors:  Lindsay S Karfeld; Steve R Bull; Nicolynn E Davis; Thomas J Meade; Annelise E Barron
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 4.774

3.  Magnetization transfer imaging provides a quantitative measure of chondrogenic differentiation and tissue development.

Authors:  Weiguo Li; Liu Hong; Liping Hu; Richard L Magin
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Noninvasive assessment of glycosaminoglycan production in injectable tissue-engineered cartilage constructs using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sharan Ramaswamy; Mehmet C Uluer; Stephanie Leen; Preeti Bajaj; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.056

5.  An open source image processing method to quantitatively assess tissue growth after non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging in human bone marrow stromal cell seeded 3D polymeric scaffolds.

Authors:  Anne M Leferink; Raluca M Fratila; Maaike A Koenrades; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Aldrik Velders; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.