Literature DB >> 164991

A comparison of gel diffusion, fluorescent antibody and virus isolation methods in experimental and natural cases of infectious bursal disease.

P R Ide.   

Abstract

In studies with chicks inoculated with the Sk-1 strain of infectious bursal agent the bursa of Fabricius was found to be the tissue of choice for virus isolation as well as for use in the fluorescent antibody test and the agar gel diffusion test. In separate experiments positive results were obtained until postinoculation days 3 or 4 by the agar gel diffusion test, 5 or 6 by the fluorescent antibody test and 14 by the virus isolation method, respectively. Bursas from chickens involved in seven natural outbreaks of infectious bursal disease were then examined by these three methods. Virus was isolated from six outbreaks and infectious bursal agent antigen was demonstrated in three by the agar gel diffusion test method and seven (three by direct examination and four after one passage in chicks) by the fluorescent antibody test method. Passage in chicks was required when nonspecific fluorescence complicated the interpretation of fluorescent antibody test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 164991      PMCID: PMC1277440     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Comp Med        ISSN: 0008-4050


  9 in total

1.  Application of the fluorescent antibody technique to the diagnosis of avian encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  P R Ide
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1974-01

2.  Properties of the infectious bursal agent of chicken (IBA).

Authors:  J Kösters; H Becht; R Rudolph
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Antigenically-related viruses associated with infectious bursal disease.

Authors:  J D Almeida; R Morris
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.891

4.  Effect of different conditions on precipitation in agar between Marek's disease antigen and antibody.

Authors:  W Okazaki; H G Purchase; L Noll
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.577

5.  Immunodiffusion reaction to avian infectious bursal virus.

Authors:  K Hirai; S Shimakura; M Hirose
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1972 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

6.  Infectivity of infectious bursal disease virus for embryonating eggs.

Authors:  S B Hitchner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Studies on the pathogenesis of Gumboro disease in the bursa of Fabricius, spleen, and thymus of the chicken.

Authors:  N F Cheville
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Post-mortem lesions diagnostic of certain poultry diseases.

Authors:  B S Hanson
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1967-01-21       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Infectious bursal disease in New Brunswick.

Authors:  P R Ide; R G Stevenson
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1973-10
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Broiler-breeder vaccination against infectious bursal disease and persistence of maternal antibody in progeny.

Authors:  P R Ide; J A Schulte-Nordholt; W F Dewitt; J D Smith
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Infectious bursal agent vaccination of chicks from infectious bursal agent-vaccinated dams.

Authors:  P R Ide
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Serological incidence of avian reovirus infection in broiler-breeders and progeny in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  P R Ide; W Dewitt
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of the fluorescent antibody technique for detection of infectious laryngotracheitis virus.

Authors:  P R Ide
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1978-01

5.  Coagglutination test for rapid detection of infectious bursal disease virus antigen.

Authors:  S Shakya; R K Joshi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Quantitative counter-immunoelectrophoresis for estimation of antibodies to infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  G D Raj; A Thangavelu; S Elankumaran; A Koteeswaran; A T Venugopalan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.459

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.