Literature DB >> 16498651

Validation of cardiovascular risk scores in a liver transplant population.

Olaf Guckelberger1, Florian Mutzke, Matthias Glanemann, Ulf P Neumann, Sven Jonas, Ruth Neuhaus, Peter Neuhaus, Jan M Langrehr.   

Abstract

Increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors has been acknowledged in liver transplant recipients, and an increased incidence of cardiovascular events has been suspected. Individual risk determination, however, has not yet been established. Outpatient charts of 438 primary liver transplants have been reviewed, and suspected cardiovascular risk factors were correlated with cardiovascular events observed during a follow-up period of 10 yr. Receiver operation characteristics curve (ROC) analysis was performed to validate established cardiovascular risk scores. For calibration, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed. A total of 303 of 438 patients were available for risk factor analysis at 6 months and demonstrated complete follow-up data (175 male, 128 female). A total of 40 of those 303 patients experienced fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events (13.2%). In univariate analysis, age (P < 0.001), gender (P = 0.002), body mass index (P = 0.018), cholesterol (P = 0.044), creatinine (P = 0.006), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.017), glucose (0.006), and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.043), but not cyclosporine A (P = 0.743), tacrolimus (P = 0.870), or steroid medication (P = 0.991), were significantly associated with cardiovascular events. Multivariate analysis, however, identified only age, gender, and cholesterol as independent predictors. In ROC analysis, corresponding areas under the curve for Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Project (SCORE), Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study (PROCAM), and Framingham risk scores (FRSs) were calculated with 0.800, 0.778, and 0.707, respectively. Calibration demonstrated an improved goodness of fit for PROCAM compared to SCORE risk calculations. In conclusion, SCORE and PROCAM proved to be valuable in discriminating our liver transplant recipients for their individual risk of cardiovascular events. Furthermore, calibrated PROCAM risk estimates are required to calculate the number of patients needed to treat in the setup of prospective intervention trials. Copyright 2006 AASLD

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16498651     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  11 in total

1.  Trends in 10-year predicted risk of cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1976 to 2004.

Authors:  Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; John A Batsis; Véronique L Roger; Lee Brekke; Henry H Ting; Virend K Somers
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-08-18

Review 2.  Cardiovascular risk after bariatric surgery for obesity.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Michael G Sarr; Maria L Collazo-Clavell; Randal J Thomas; Abel Romero-Corral; Virend K Somers; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  A point-based prediction model for cardiovascular risk in orthotopic liver transplantation: The CAR-OLT score.

Authors:  Lisa B VanWagner; Hongyan Ning; Maureen Whitsett; Josh Levitsky; Sarah Uttal; John T Wilkins; Michael M Abecassis; Daniela P Ladner; Anton I Skaro; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 4.  Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Robert J Donovan; Calvin Choi; Asghar Ali; Douglas M Heuman; Michael Fuchs; Anthony A Bavry; Ion S Jovin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Incidence of and Risk Assessment for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Monica A Konerman; Danielle Fritze; Richard L Weinberg; Christopher J Sonnenday; Pratima Sharma
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sanjaya Kumar Satapathy; Satheesh Nair; Jason M Vanatta
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 7.  Management of cardiac diseases in liver transplant recipients: Comprehensive review and multidisciplinary practice-based recommendations.

Authors:  Manhal Izzy; Brett E Fortune; Marina Serper; Nicole Bhave; Andrew deLemos; Juan F Gallegos-Orozco; Cesar Guerrero-Miranda; Shelley Hall; Matthew E Harinstein; Maria G Karas; Michael Kriss; Nicholas Lim; Maryse Palardy; Deirdre Sawinski; Emily Schonfeld; Anil Seetharam; Pratima Sharma; Jose Tallaj; Darshana M Dadhania; Lisa B VanWagner
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 9.369

8.  Short-term cardiac and noncardiac mortality following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; R Todd Hurst; Hugo E Vargas; Jorge Rakela; David C Mulligan; Christopher P Appleton
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-08-12

Review 9.  Pre-and-post transplant considerations in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Vikas Khullar; Angela Dolganiuc; Roberto J Firpi
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  The Role of Arterial Stiffness in the Estimation of Cardiovascular Risk in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Lydia Sastre; Raquel García; Julián-Gonzalo Gándara; Patricia Fernández-Llama; Antonio J Amor; Cristina Sierra; Laia Escudé; Pablo Ruiz; Jordi Colmenero; Emilio Ortega; Miquel Navasa; Gonzalo Crespo
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.