Literature DB >> 16498588

An experimental investigation of recruitment bias in eating pathology research.

Erin L Moss1, Kristin M von Ranson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Previous, uncontrolled research has suggested a bias may exist in recruiting participants for eating disorder research. Recruitment biases may affect sample representativeness and generalizability of findings.
OBJECTIVE: This experiment investigated whether revealing that a study's topic was related to eating disorders created a self-selection bias.
METHOD: Young women at a university responded to advertisements containing contrasting information about the nature of a single study. We recruited one group by advertising the study under the title "Disordered Eating in Young Women" (n = 251) and another group using the title "Consumer Preferences" (n = 259).
RESULTS: Results indicated similar levels of eating pathology in both groups, so the different recruitment techniques did not engender self-selection. However, the consumer preferences group scored higher in self-reported social desirability.
CONCLUSION: The level of information conveyed in study advertising does not impact reporting of eating disturbances among nonclinical samples, although there is evidence social desirability might. 2006 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16498588     DOI: 10.1002/eat.20230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  2 in total

1.  Recruitment for a guided self-help binge eating trial: potential lessons for implementing programs in everyday practice settings.

Authors:  Lynn L DeBar; Bobbi Jo Yarborough; Ruth H Striegel-Moore; Francine Rosselli; Nancy Perrin; G Terence Wilson; Helena C Kraemer; Rory Green; Frances Lynch
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Eating disorder measures in a sample of military veterans: A focus on gender, age, and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Karen S Mitchell; Robin Masheb; Brian N Smith; Shannon Kehle-Forbes; Sabrina Hardin; Dawne Vogt
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2021-07-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.