Literature DB >> 16498182

Predicting in vivo soft tissue masses of the lower extremity using segment anthropometric measures and DXA.

Jeffrey D Holmes1, David M Andrews, Jennifer L Durkin, James J Dowling.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to derive and validate regression equations for the prediction of fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), wobbling mass (WM), and bone mineral content (BMC) of the thigh, leg, and leg + foot segments of living people from easily measured segmental anthropometric measures. The segment masses of 68 university-age participants (26 M, 42 F) were obtained from full-body dual photon x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, and were used as the criterion values against which predicted masses were compared. Comprehensive anthropometric measures (6 lengths, 6 circumferences, 8 breadths, 4 skinfolds) were taken bilaterally for the thigh and leg for each person. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to derive a prediction equation for each mass type and segment. Prediction equations exhibited high adjusted R2 values in general (0.673 to 0.925), with higher correlations evident for the LM and WM equations than for FM and BMC. Predicted (equations) and measured (DXA) segment LM and WM were also found to be highly correlated (R2 = 0.85 to 0.96), and FM and BMC to a lesser extent (R2 = 0.49 to 0.78). Relative errors between predicted and measured masses ranged between 0.7% and -11.3% for all those in the validation sample (n = 16). These results on university-age men and women are encouraging and suggest that in vivo estimates of the soft tissue masses of the lower extremity can be made fairly accurately from simple segmental anthropometric measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16498182     DOI: 10.1123/jab.21.4.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  6 in total

Review 1.  Use of anthropometry for the prediction of regional body tissue distribution in adults: benefits and limitations in clinical practice.

Authors:  Aldo Scafoglieri; Jan Pieter Clarys; Erik Cattrysse; Ivan Bautmans
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 6.745

2.  Prediction of Android and Gynoid Body Adiposity via a Three-dimensional Stereovision Body Imaging System and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Jane J Lee; Jeanne H Freeland-Graves; M Reese Pepper; Philip R Stanforth; Bugao Xu
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Shift in body fat distribution from lower body to upper body among urban Colombian women, 1988-1989 to 2007-2008.

Authors:  Richard L Bender; Traci A Bekelman; Paul A Sandberg; Darna L Dufour; Julio C Reina
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Creatinine and myoglobin are poor predictors of anaerobic threshold in colorectal cancer and health.

Authors:  Sitaramachandra M Nyasavajjala; Beth E Phillips; Jon N Lund; John P Williams
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 12.910

5.  Are body circumferences able to predict strength, muscle mass and bone characteristics in obesity? A preliminary study in women.

Authors:  Valentina Cavedon; Chiara Milanese; Carlo Zancanaro
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Prediction equation for lower limbs lean soft tissue in circumpubertal boys using anthropometry and biological maturation.

Authors:  João Valente-dos-Santos; Manuel J Coelho-e-Silva; Aristides M Machado-Rodrigues; Marije T Elferink-Gemser; Robert M Malina; Édio L Petroski; Cláudia S Minderico; Analiza M Silva; Fátima Baptista; Luís B Sardinha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.