Literature DB >> 16498160

Removal of C-spine protection by A&E triage nurses: a prospective trial of a clinical decision making instrument.

E Pitt1, D K Pedley, A Nelson, M Cumming, M Johnston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if triage nurses could safely apply a set of clinical criteria, removing hard collars and spinal boards at initial triage assessment.
METHODS: The Nexus clinical decision rules were applied by trained triage nurses to patients who attended the department with cervical collars and/or on spinal boards. Patients were excluded if they were felt to be in need of immediate medical assessment. Data were collected on the time to nursing assessment, time to medical assessment and time spent restrained. Patients were followed up until discharge and their radiological diagnosis confirmed. Hospital records were checked to ensure that no patients re-presented with injuries that had been missed at initial assessment.
RESULTS: In total, 112 patients were included in the study. Clinical criteria were met in 59 patients and their collar removed at triage assessment. For low risk patients, this reflects a mean reduction in time spent restrained of 23.3 minutes (p<0.005; 95% confidence interval 20.18 to 26.54). No patient who had a collar removed was found to have a significant injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple criteria can be applied by accident and emergency triage nurses to allow safe removal of cervical collars and spinal boards. The reduced time patients spent immobilised represents an important improvement in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16498160      PMCID: PMC2464447          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2005.023697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

1.  Can nurses remove spinal boards and cervical collars safely?

Authors:  J Sexton
Journal:  Emerg Nurse       Date:  1999-02

2.  Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group.

Authors:  J R Hoffman; W R Mower; A B Wolfson; K H Todd; M I Zucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Spinal immobilisation for unconscious patients with multiple injuries.

Authors:  C G Morris; E P McCoy; G G Lavery; E McCoy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

4.  A review of seven support surfaces with emphasis on their protection of the spinally injured.

Authors:  P W Main; M E Lovell
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-01

5.  Use of the spinal board within the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  M W Cooke
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-03

6.  A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children.

Authors:  P Viccellio; H Simon; B D Pressman; M N Shah; W R Mower; J R Hoffman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Confusing extrication with immobilization: the inappropriate use of hard spine boards for interhospital transfers.

Authors:  M Hauswald; T McNally
Journal:  Air Med J       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec

8.  The UK emergency department practice for spinal board unloading. Is there conformity?

Authors:  K M Porter; K P Allison
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; R Douglas McKnight; Robert Brison; Michael J Schull; Brian H Rowe; James R Worthington; Mary A Eisenhauer; Daniel Cass; Gary Greenberg; Iain MacPhail; Jonathan Dreyer; Jacques S Lee; Glen Bandiera; Mark Reardon; Brian Holroyd; Howard Lesiuk; George A Wells
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma.

Authors:  Michael Touger; Paul Gennis; Noel Nathanson; Douglas W Lowery; Charles V Pollack; Jerome R Hoffman; William R Mower
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.721

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Annette O'Connor; Barbara Davies; Christine Leclair; Pamela Sheehan; Tamara Clavet; Christine Beland; Taryn MacKenzie; George A Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Application of imaging guidelines in patients with suspected cervical spine trauma: retrospective analysis and literature review.

Authors:  Nima Kokabi; Daniel M S Raper; Minzhi Xing; Bruno Mario Giuffre
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-08-31

3.  Prehospital clearance of the cervical spine: does it need to be a pain in the neck?

Authors:  B P Armstrong; H K Simpson; R Crouch; C D Deakin
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Factors which affect the application and implementation of a spinal motion restriction protocol by prehospital providers in a low resource setting: A scoping review.

Authors:  Charlene Geduld; Henra Muller; Colleen J Saunders
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-15

5.  Geriatric Trauma Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures due to Ground Level Fall: Five Years Experience in a Level One Trauma Center.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Marco Coppola; Richard D Robinson; James T Scribner; Veer Vithalani; Carrie E de Moor; Raj R Gandhi; Mandy Burton; Kathleen A Delaney
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-02-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.