STUDY OBJECTIVE: To establish a predictive scoring system and to determine its effectiveness for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) cases confirmed by RT-PCR in patients with fever. METHODS: A study was conducted of 484 consecutive patients seen in the emergency department (ED) of our tertiary care center during the SARS outbreak in Taiwan. The scoring system was divided into triage and screening station stages. Data were analysed with multivariable and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 737 patients who presented to our ED for possible SARS from March to June 2003, we enrolled 484 patients with a temperature >38.0 degrees C (>100.3 degrees F) (age >18 years). Dyspnoea, diarrhoea, travel, close contact, hospital exposure, and household history were identified as predictive indicators in the triage stage. The triage score was the total of six items. With a one-point cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.8% (18/22) and 73.6% (340/462). Leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and CXR were identified as predictive indicators in the fever screening stage. Screening station scores (the sum of 10 items) consisted of triage scores, white blood cell count, and CXR. With a three-point cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% (21/22) and 87.2% (403/462). CONCLUSIONS: Syndromic and traditional surveillance play a role in early identification of SARS in an endemic area. The SARS scoring system described is easily applicable and highly effective in screening patients during outbreaks.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To establish a predictive scoring system and to determine its effectiveness for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) cases confirmed by RT-PCR in patients with fever. METHODS: A study was conducted of 484 consecutive patients seen in the emergency department (ED) of our tertiary care center during the SARS outbreak in Taiwan. The scoring system was divided into triage and screening station stages. Data were analysed with multivariable and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 737 patients who presented to our ED for possible SARS from March to June 2003, we enrolled 484 patients with a temperature >38.0 degrees C (>100.3 degrees F) (age >18 years). Dyspnoea, diarrhoea, travel, close contact, hospital exposure, and household history were identified as predictive indicators in the triage stage. The triage score was the total of six items. With a one-point cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.8% (18/22) and 73.6% (340/462). Leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and CXR were identified as predictive indicators in the fever screening stage. Screening station scores (the sum of 10 items) consisted of triage scores, white blood cell count, and CXR. With a three-point cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% (21/22) and 87.2% (403/462). CONCLUSIONS: Syndromic and traditional surveillance play a role in early identification of SARS in an endemic area. The SARS scoring system described is easily applicable and highly effective in screening patients during outbreaks.
Authors: Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nelson Lee; David Hui; Alan Wu; Paul Chan; Peter Cameron; Gavin M Joynt; Anil Ahuja; Man Yee Yung; C B Leung; K F To; S F Lui; C C Szeto; Sydney Chung; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kenneth W Tsang; Pak L Ho; Gaik C Ooi; Wilson K Yee; Teresa Wang; Moira Chan-Yeung; Wah K Lam; Wing H Seto; Loretta Y Yam; Thomas M Cheung; Poon C Wong; Bing Lam; Mary S Ip; Jane Chan; Kwok Y Yuen; Kar N Lai Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan M Poutanen; Donald E Low; Bonnie Henry; Sandy Finkelstein; David Rose; Karen Green; Raymond Tellier; Ryan Draker; Dena Adachi; Melissa Ayers; Adrienne K Chan; Danuta M Skowronski; Irving Salit; Andrew E Simor; Arthur S Slutsky; Patrick W Doyle; Mel Krajden; Martin Petric; Robert C Brunham; Allison J McGeer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher M Booth; Larissa M Matukas; George A Tomlinson; Anita R Rachlis; David B Rose; Hy A Dwosh; Sharon L Walmsley; Tony Mazzulli; Monica Avendano; Peter Derkach; Issa E Ephtimios; Ian Kitai; Barbara D Mederski; Steven B Shadowitz; Wayne L Gold; Laura A Hawryluck; Elizabeth Rea; Jordan S Chenkin; David W Cescon; Susan M Poutanen; Allan S Detsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Timothy H Rainer; Peter A Cameron; DeVilliers Smit; Kim L Ong; Alex Ng Wing Hung; David Chan Po Nin; Anil T Ahuja; Louis Chan Yik Si; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-06-21
Authors: Samantha F Bordonaro; Daniel C McGillicuddy; Francesco Pompei; Dmitriy Burmistrov; Charles Harding; Leon D Sanchez Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2016-03-09
Authors: An V Nguyen; Nicole J Cohen; Harvey Lipman; Clive M Brown; Noelle Angelique Molinari; William L Jackson; Hannah Kirking; Paige Szymanowski; Todd W Wilson; Bisan A Salhi; Rebecca R Roberts; David W Stryker; Daniel B Fishbein Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Luis Garcia-Castrillo; Roberta Petrino; Robert Leach; Christoph Dodt; Wilhelm Behringer; Abdo Khoury; Marc Sabbe Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.106