Literature DB >> 16498109

Axial rotation of the lumbar spinal motion segments correlated with concordant pain on discography: a preliminary study.

Donna G Blankenbaker1, Victor M Haughton, Baxter P Rogers, M Elizabeth Meyerand, Jason P Fine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One possible cause of back pain in patients with intervertebral disk degeneration is decreased stability of the motion segment. Axial rotations between lumbar spinal vertebrae can be measured noninvasively with CT. We tested the hypothesis that larger axial rotations are found in motion segments with disks that test positive for concordant pain, which is considered by some investigators to be a reasonable, accurate predictor of spinal instability. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between October 2002 and March 2004, all patients undergoing discography were evaluated for inclusion in the study, with the approval of the institutional review board. All patients in whom concordant pain was detected at discography were enrolled in the study. The patients were placed supine in the CT scanner on a table that rotated the pelvis 8 degrees clockwise and then counterclockwise with respect to the thorax. CT images were obtained with the patient in the two positions of rotation. An automated program calculated the amount of rotation between each lumbar vertebra as a result of the table rotations. Rotations were stratified by disk level and by disk classification (concordant pain, nonconcordant pain, no significant pain).
RESULTS: We recorded the axial rotations of 94 disks in 16 consecutive patients (10 women, six men; age range, 26-53 years) after two disks were excluded because of a previous fusion. There were 68 normal disks by MRI and discography, six disks with nonconcordant pain, and 20 disks with concordant pain. Rotation averaged 0.6 degrees for the normal disks, 1.4 degrees for disks with nonconcordant pain, and 1.8 degrees for disks with concordant pain. The differences were significant (analysis of variance, p < 0.001). Disks at L3-L4 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.2 degrees , whereas disks classified as normal or nonconcordant pain rotated on average 0.7 degrees (significant at p = 0.005). Disks at L4-L5 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.9 degrees , and those without concordant pain rotated on average 1.4 degrees (significant at p = 0.05). Disks with concordant pain at L5-S1 had an average rotation of 2.2 degrees , whereas disks without concordant pain had an average rotation of 1.5 degrees (marginally significant difference at p = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: Concordant pain at discography predicts increased axial rotation at a lumbar disk level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16498109     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Shaobai Wang; Peter Passias; Qun Xia; Gang Li; Kirkham Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Ageing and degenerative changes of the intervertebral disc and their impact on spinal flexibility.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Marc van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Jacques M Huyghe; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Rotational hypermobility of disc wedging using kinematic CT: preliminary study to investigate the instability of discs in degenerated scoliosis in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Masaomi Yamashita; Gen Inoue; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Takana Koshi; Munetaka Suzuki; Masashi Takaso; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Nobuyasu Ochiai; Shunji Kishida; Masaya Mimura; Noriyuki Yanagawa; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Gen Arai; Masayuki Miyagi; Hiroto Kamoda; Yasuchika Aoki; Kazuki Kuniyoshi; Junichi Nakamura; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of animal discs used in disc research to human lumbar disc: torsion mechanics and collagen content.

Authors:  Brent L Showalter; Jesse C Beckstein; John T Martin; Elizabeth E Beattie; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Thomas P Schaer; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Challenges and strategies in the repair of ruptured annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  C C Guterl; E Y See; S B G Blanquer; A Pandit; S J Ferguson; L M Benneker; D W Grijpma; D Sakai; D Eglin; M Alini; J C Iatridis; S Grad
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.942

6.  Rat disc torsional mechanics: effect of lumbar and caudal levels and axial compression load.

Authors:  Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Neil R Malhotra; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Gait adaptations in low back pain patients with lumbar disc herniation: trunk coordination and arm swing.

Authors:  Yun Peng Huang; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Jian Hua Lin; Onno G Meijer; Wen Hua Wu; Hamid Abbasi-Bafghi; Xiao Cong Lin; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Mechanisms of intervertebral disk degeneration/injury and pain: a review.

Authors:  Keita Ito; Laura Creemers
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-05-21

9.  In Situ Cell Signalling of the Hippo-YAP/TAZ Pathway in Reaction to Complex Dynamic Loading in an Intervertebral Disc Organ Culture.

Authors:  Andreas S Croft; Ysaline Roth; Katharina A C Oswald; Slavko Ćorluka; Paola Bermudez-Lekerika; Benjamin Gantenbein
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.