Literature DB >> 16497996

Variability of spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from two clinical trials.

Laura B Herpel1, Richard E Kanner, Shing M Lee, Henry E Fessler, Frank C Sciurba, John E Connett, Robert A Wise.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal is to determine short-term intraindividual biologic and measurement variability in spirometry of patients with a wide range of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity, using datasets from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) and the Lung Health Study (LHS). This may be applied to determine criteria that can be used to assess a clinically meaningful change in spirometry.
METHODS: A total of 5,886 participants from the LHS and 1,215 participants from the NETT performed prebronchodilator spirometry during two baseline sessions. We analyzed varying criteria for absolute and percent change of FEV(1) and FVC to determine which criterion was met by 90% of the participants.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD FEV(1) for the initial session was 2.64 +/- 0.60 L (75.1 +/- 8.8% predicted) for the LHS and 0.68 +/- 0.22 L (23.7 +/- 6.5% predicted) for the NETT. The mean +/- SD number of days between test sessions was 24.9 +/- 17.1 for the LHS and 85.7 +/- 21.7 for the NETT. As the degree of obstruction increased, the intersession percent difference of FEV(1) increased. However, the absolute difference between tests remained relatively constant despite the severity of obstruction (0.106 +/- 0.10 L). Over 90% of participants had an intersession FEV(1) difference of less than 225 ml irrespective of the severity of obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Absolute changes in FEV(1) rather than percent change should be used to determine whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have improved or worsened between test sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16497996      PMCID: PMC2662942          DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200506-975OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  25 in total

1.  Acceptability and reproducibility criteria of the American Thoracic Society as observed in a sample of the general population.

Authors:  J L Hankinson; K M Bang
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-03

2.  Interpretative strategies for lung function tests.

Authors:  R Pellegrino; G Viegi; V Brusasco; R O Crapo; F Burgos; R Casaburi; A Coates; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D C Johnson; N MacIntyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; O F Pedersen; J Wanger
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 3.  Assessing the minimally clinically significant difference: scientific considerations, challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Jeff A Sloan
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 4.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary.

Authors:  R A Pauwels; A S Buist; P M Calverley; C R Jenkins; S S Hurd
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Responses to isoproterenol in a general population sample.

Authors:  D B Lorber; W Kaltenborn; B Burrows
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1978-11

6.  Changes in measured spirometric indices. What is significant?

Authors:  B E Pennock; R M Rogers; D R McCaffree
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Diurnal variation in lung function in subgroups from two Dutch populations: consequences for longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  G J Borsboom; W van Pelt; H C van Houwelingen; B G van Vianen; J P Schouten; P H Quanjer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 8.  Minimal clinically important differences in COPD lung function.

Authors:  James F Donohue
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.409

9.  Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations.

Authors:  R O Crapo; A H Morris; R M Gardner
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1981-06

10.  Interpretation of bronchodilator response in patients with obstructive airways disease. The Dutch Chronic Non-Specific Lung Disease (CNSLD) Study Group.

Authors:  P L Brand; P H Quanjer; D S Postma; H A Kerstjens; G H Koëter; P N Dekhuijzen; H J Sluiter
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  19 in total

1.  Limits of longitudinal decline for the interpretation of annual changes in FEV1 in individuals.

Authors:  Eva Hnizdo; Kanta Sircar; Tieliang Yan; Philip Harber; James Fleming; Henry W Glindmeyer
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Spirometry.

Authors:  Theodore G Liou; Richard E Kanner
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Efficiency of neural respiratory drive for the assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Yun Li; Yin-Huan Li; Shuo Li; Yu-Wen Luo; Rui Xiao; Yu-Xia Huang; Jin-Lun Huang; Yi-Tai Chen; Rong-Chang Zhi; Xin Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Effect of chronic disease-related symptoms and impairments on universal health outcomes in older adults.

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti; Gail McAvay; Sandy S Chang; Yuming Ning; Anne B Newman; Annette Fitzpatrick; Terri R Fried; Tamara B Harris; Michael C Nevitt; Suzanne Satterfield; Kristine Yaffe; Peter Peduzzi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  Asthma outcomes: pulmonary physiology.

Authors:  Robert S Tepper; Robert S Wise; Ronina Covar; Charles G Irvin; Carolyn M Kercsmar; Monica Kraft; Mark C Liu; George T O'Connor; Stephen P Peters; Ronald Sorkness; Alkis Togias
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 6.  The diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Rainer Burkhardt; Wulf Pankow
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Characterization and detection of physiologic lung changes before and after placement of bronchial valves using hyperpolarized helium-3 MR imaging: preliminary study.

Authors:  Jaime Mata; Talissa Altes; Jonathon Truwit; Peter Sylvester; Eduard de Lange; Yun Shim; Ajeet Vinayak; James Brookeman; John Mugler
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Quantitative computed tomography to predict postoperative FEV1 after lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Alex Fourdrain; Florence De Dominicis; Sophie Lafitte; Jules Iquille; Flavien Prevot; Emmanuel Lorne; Julien Monconduit; Patrick Bagan; Pascal Berna
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  R G Barr; J Bourbeau; C A Camargo; F S F Ram
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Point of Care Portable Spirometry in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Inpatients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Donald Tran; Melvin Lim; Sara Vogrin; Lata Jayaram
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.