OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. METHODS: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30,433 women and 7718 men aged 17-64 were used (n = 35,918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as <2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. RESULTS: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. CONCLUSIONS: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. METHODS: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30,433 women and 7718 men aged 17-64 were used (n = 35,918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as <2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. RESULTS: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. CONCLUSIONS: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.
Authors: J Pomerleau; M McKee; A Robertson; S Vaasc; K Kadziauskiene; A Abaravicius; R Bartkeviciute; I Pudule; D Grinberga Journal: Prev Med Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Benjamin C Amick; Peggy McDonough; Hong Chang; William H Rogers; Carl F Pieper; Greg Duncan Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Fehmidah Munir; Jonathan Houdmont; Stacy Clemes; Kelly Wilson; Robert Kerr; Ken Addley Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Bongkyoo Choi; Peter Schnall; Marnie Dobson; Leslie Israel; Paul Landsbergis; Pietro Galassetti; Andria Pontello; Stacey Kojaku; Dean Baker Journal: Saf Health Work Date: 2011-12-05