Literature DB >> 16497510

Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase.

Arie Pieter Kappetein1, Keith D Dawkins, Friedrich W Mohr, Marie Claude Morice, Michael J Mack, Mary E Russell, Jose Pomar, Patrick W J C Serruys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents is challenging coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the gold standard for treatment of three-vessel and left main coronary disease. We evaluated the current practice pattern in hospitals throughout Europe and USA.
METHODS: To qualify for participation in the SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with TAXUS drug-eluting stent and Cardiac Surgery) study, a randomized trial comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting for three-vessel and left main disease, 104 centers were asked to provide their case volume in 3 months in 2004. Anonymous procedural data were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 12,072 patients were recorded. Coronary artery bypass grafting was the most frequently performed procedure (N=8895, 74%). Three-vessel disease (3VD) predominated in this population (N=8532, 71%) versus left main (N=3540, 29%). In the 3-month period, per center a mean of 8.3 patients with left main and 22.3 patients with three-vessel disease were treated by percutaneous coronary intervention, while 26.0 patients with left main and 60.3 patients with three-vessel disease were treated by coronary artery bypass grafting. In USA, percutaneous coronary intervention for left main and/or three-vessel disease was performed in 18% of the cases while this was performed in 29% of the cases in Europe. Of all CABG procedures, only 12% were done with total arterial grafting while 7% were treated with only venous grafts.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multivessel or left main disease, still coronary artery bypass grafting remains the dominant revascularization strategy. Percutaneous coronary intervention is performed frequently without supporting data from the literature. Percutaneous coronary intervention for this indication is performed more often in Europe than in USA. Only a minority of the patients receives total arterial grafting in case of coronary artery bypass grafting. The SYNTAX trial with randomized and registry cohorts should provide guidance for selecting the preferred form of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16497510     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  33 in total

1.  [Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines].

Authors:  A Thiem; T Attmann; J Cremer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Comment on: Predicting operative mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  S Kesavan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Revascularization treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S G Foussas; G Z Tsiaousis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Bilateral internal mammary arteries: evidence and technical considerations.

Authors:  Michael P Vallely; J James B Edelman; Michael K Wilson
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

5.  A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Aaron J Weiss; Shan Zhao; David H Tian; David P Taggart; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 6.  Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-18

Review 7.  The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review.

Authors:  Stephen A May; James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

8.  Significance of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Akira Marui; Takeshi Kimura; Shiro Tanaka; Yutaka Furukawa; Toru Kita; Ryuzo Sakata
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 9.  Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Piroze M Davierwala; Freidrich W Mohr
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  Clinical outcome and quality of life after interventional treatment of left main disease with drug-eluting-stents in comparison to CABG in elderly and younger patients.

Authors:  H Rittger; J Rieber; K Kögler; A Sinha; M Schmidt; O-A Breithardt; P Biggar; F Einsle; A Diegeler; J Brachmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.