Literature DB >> 16497118

Online deception: prevalence, motivation, and emotion.

Avner Caspi1, Paul Gorsky.   

Abstract

This research has three goals: first, to find out how prevalent online deception is within a sample of Israeli users, second, to explore the underlying motivations to deceive online, and third, to discover the emotions that accompany online deception. A web-based survey was distributed in 14 discussion groups, and the answers of 257 respondents were analyzed. It was found that, while most of the respondents believe that online deception is very widespread, only about one-third of them reported engaging in online deception. Frequent users deceive online more than infrequent users, young users more than old, and competent users more than non-competent. The most common motivations to deceive online were "play" on the one hand and privacy concerns on the other. Most people felt a sense of enjoyment while engaging in online deception. The results are discussed in light of a possible mechanism for changing personal moral standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16497118     DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav        ISSN: 1094-9313


  6 in total

1.  What are adolescents showing the world about their health risk behaviors on MySpace?

Authors:  Megan A Moreno; Malcolm Parks; Laura P Richardson
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-10-11

2.  Epidemiology from Tweets: Estimating Misuse of Prescription Opioids in the USA from Social Media.

Authors:  Michael Chary; Nicholas Genes; Christophe Giraud-Carrier; Carl Hanson; Lewis S Nelson; Alex F Manini
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-22

3.  An evaluation of the distribution of sexual references among "Top 8" MySpace friends.

Authors:  Megan A Moreno; Libby Brockman; Cara B Rogers; Dimitri A Christakis
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Altruistic and self-serving goals modulate behavioral and neural responses in deception.

Authors:  Fang Cui; Song Wu; Haiyan Wu; Chengyao Wang; Can Jiao; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Recruiting Hard-to-Reach Populations for Survey Research: Using Facebook and Instagram Advertisements and In-Person Intercept in LGBT Bars and Nightclubs to Recruit LGBT Young Adults.

Authors:  Jamie Guillory; Kristine F Wiant; Matthew Farrelly; Leah Fiacco; Ishrat Alam; Leah Hoffman; Erik Crankshaw; Janine Delahanty; Tesfa N Alexander
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Munchausen by internet: current research and future directions.

Authors:  Andy Pulman; Jacqui Taylor
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.