Literature DB >> 16495314

Temperature sensitivity of the low-moisture-content limit to negative seed longevity--moisture content relationships in hermetic storage.

R H Ellis1, T D Hong.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND AND AIMS The negative logarithmic relationship between orthodox seed longevity and moisture content in hermetic storage is subject to a low-moisture-content limit (m(c)), but is m(c) affected by temperature?
METHODS: Red clover (Trifolium pratense) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seeds were stored hermetically at 12 moisture contents (2-15 %) and five temperatures (-20, 30, 40, 50 and 65 degrees C) for up to 14.5 years, and loss in viability was estimated. KEY
RESULTS: Viability did not change during 14.5 years hermetic storage at -20 degrees C with moisture contents from 2.2 to 14.9 % for red clover, or 2.0 to 12.0 % for alfalfa. Negative logarithmic relationships between longevity and moisture contents >m(c) were detected at 30-65 degrees C, with discontinuities at low moisture contents; m(c) varied between 4.0 and 5.4 % (red clover) or 4.2 and 5.5 % (alfalfa), depending upon storage temperature. Within the ranges investigated, a reduction in moisture content below m(c) at any one temperature had no effect on longevity. Estimates of m(c) were greater the cooler the temperature, the relationship (P < 0.01) being curvilinear. Above m(c), the estimates of C(H) and C(Q) (i.e. the temperature term of the seed viability equation) did not differ (P > 0.10) between species, whereas those of K(E) and C(W) did (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The low-moisture-content limit to negative logarithmic relationships between seed longevity and moisture content in hermetic storage increased the cooler the storage temperature, by approx. 1.5 % over 35 degrees C (4.0-4.2 % at 65 degrees C to 5.4-5.5 % at 30-40 degrees C) in these species. Further reduction in moisture content was not damaging. The variation in m(c) implies greater sensitivity of longevity to temperature above, compared with below, m(c). This was confirmed (P < 0.005).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16495314      PMCID: PMC2803418          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  1 in total

1.  Theoretical basis of protocols for seed storage.

Authors:  C W Vertucci; E E Roos
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 8.340

  1 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Orthodoxy, recalcitrance and in-between: describing variation in seed storage characteristics using threshold responses to water loss.

Authors:  Christina Walters
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Seed Moisture Isotherms, Sorption Models, and Longevity.

Authors:  Fiona R Hay; Shabnam Rezaei; Julia Buitink
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Increases in the longevity of desiccation-phase developing rice seeds: response to high-temperature drying depends on harvest moisture content.

Authors:  K J Whitehouse; F R Hay; R H Ellis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Implications of the lack of desiccation tolerance in recalcitrant seeds.

Authors:  Patricia Berjak; Norman W Pammenter
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Proteins in Relation to Vigor and Viability of White Lupin (Lupinus albus L.) Seed Stored for 26 Years.

Authors:  Malwina Dobiesz; Agnieszka I Piotrowicz-Cieślak
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Rapid loss of seed viability in ex situ conserved wheat and barley at 4°C as compared to -20°C storage.

Authors:  Rob van Treuren; Noor Bas; Jan Kodde; Steven P C Groot; Chris Kik
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  The effects of high oxygen partial pressure on vegetable Allium seeds with a short shelf-life.

Authors:  James E Hourston; Marta Pérez; Frances Gawthrop; Michael Richards; Tina Steinbrecher; Gerhard Leubner-Metzger
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 8.  Why Seed Physiology Is Important for Genebanking.

Authors:  Katherine J Whitehouse; Fiona R Hay; Charlotte Lusty
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.