Literature DB >> 16494991

Spontaneous gasping decreases intracranial pressure and improves cerebral perfusion in a pig model of ventricular fibrillation.

Vijay Srinivasan1, Vinay M Nadkarni, Demetris Yannopoulos, Bradley S Marino, Gardar Sigurdsson, Scott H McKnite, Maureen Zook, David G Benditt, Keith G Lurie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous gasping is associated with increased survival in animal models of cardiac arrest and in observational studies of humans. The potential beneficial effect of gasping on cerebral perfusion may underlie the observed survival benefit, but mechanisms remain unknown. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that spontaneous gasping in a pig model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) decreases intracranial pressure (ICP) and increases cerebral perfusion pressure (CePP) during VF in a pig model.
METHODS: The 13 female farm pigs, weighing between 16 and 33 kg, were anesthetized with propofol and intubated, and then had VF induced for 8 min without intervention. Intrathoracic pressure (ITP), aortic pressure (AoP), and ICP were measured continuously. CePP and ITP were recorded simultaneously during three maximal gasps and correlated with gasping by Spearman rank correlation.
RESULTS: Gasping during VF occurred in 13/13 pigs and followed a crescendo-decrescendo pattern. Each gasp was associated with a biphasic AoP (initial fall, then rise) and ICP (initial rise, then fall) morphology. Time to first gasp (r(2)=0.06), time to maximal gasp (r(2)=0.02), duration of gasping (r(2)=0.11) and frequency of gasping (r(2)=0.32) did not correlate significantly with CePP during gasping while depth of gasping exhibited a weak but significant correlation with CePP (r(2)=0.35, p=0.05). Maximal gasping occurred at 202+/-34 s from onset of VF and resulted in an average decrease in ICP from 27.4+/-5.8 to 20+/-6.7 mmHg, p<0.01 along with an increase in CePP from -0.05+/-10.9 to 11.5+/-12.6 mmHg, p<0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous gasping during cardiac arrest decreased intra-cranial pressure and increased cerebral perfusion pressure significantly. These results may help explain why gasping is associated with improved cardiac arrest survival rates. Based upon this new understanding of the physiology of gasping, we speculate that investigation of devices that can enhance the physiological effects of gasping on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion should be prioritized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16494991     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Continued breathing followed by gasping or apnea in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Gordon A Ewy; Ronald W Hilwig; Arthur B Sanders; Charles W Otto; Robert A Berg; Karl B Kern
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Gasping in response to basic resuscitation efforts: observation in a Swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Gordon A Ewy; Charles W Otto; Ronald W Hilwig; Bentley J Bobrow; Lani Clark; Vatsal Chikani; Arthur B Sanders; Robert A Berg; Karl B Kern
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2010-05-31

3.  Effect of controlled sequential elevation timing of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Carolina Rojas-Salvador; Johanna C Moore; Bayert Salverda; Michael Lick; Guillaume Debaty; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Re: Neural injury after use of vasopressin and adrenaline during porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Eric M Rottenberg
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 5.  Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mai Louise Grandsgaard Mikkelsen; Rikard Ambrus; James Edward Miles; Helle Harding Poulsen; Finn Borgbjerg Moltke; Thomas Eriksen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 1.695

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.