Literature DB >> 16494978

An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.

Mohammad Abdoli-E1, Michael J Agnew, Joan M Stevenson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new on-body personal lift augmentation device was developed to support the back muscles during the repetitive lifting task.
METHODS: Nine male subjects participated in the study. Three Fastrak units were used to record positions and rotations of the segments. Trunk muscle normalized and integrated electromyography of the left and right thoracic erector spinae, lumbar erector spinae, external obliques, and rectus abdominis, as well as the kinematic variables of peak lumbar angle, peak pelvis angle, peak trunk acceleration, peak load acceleration were compared in symmetrical lifting for three different loads (5 kg, 15 kg, 25 kg) with three different styles (stooped, squat, free) under two conditions of with and without personal lift assist device.
FINDINGS: The lift assist device significantly reduced the required muscular effort of the lumbar (p = 0.001) and thoracic erector spinae with no significant differences in the level of abdominal muscle activity. The amount of integrated electromyography reduction ranged from 14.4% to 27.6% for the lumbar and thoracic erector spinae respectively. Simple measures of trunk posture and accelerations confirmed that there were no differences in lifting technique that would cause the integrated electromyography activity to be reduced. No major kinematic differences were found when the lift assist device was worn indicating that it did not alter these specific technique variables.
INTERPRETATION: The lift assist device did reduce the required muscular effort of the lumbar and thoracic erector spinae without adversely affecting the level of abdominal muscle activity. This reduction may help reduce the risk of recurring back injuries or assist in the return to work phase, especially in repetitive tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16494978     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  10 in total

1.  The Correlation between the Muscle Activity and Joint Angle of the Lower Extremity According to the Changes in Stance Width during a Lifting Task.

Authors:  Jung-Gyu Yoon
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-09-20

2.  A Real-Time Lift Detection Strategy for a Hip Exoskeleton.

Authors:  Baojun Chen; Lorenzo Grazi; Francesco Lanotte; Nicola Vitiello; Simona Crea
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Determining Changes in Electromyography Indices when Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.

Authors:  A Salehi Sahl Abadi; A Mazloumi; G Nasl Saraji; H Zeraati; M R Hadian; A H Jafari
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2018-03-01

4.  Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams.

Authors:  Matthias B Näf; Axel S Koopman; Saskia Baltrusch; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-06-21

5.  Effects of an industrial passive assistive exoskeleton on muscle activity, oxygen consumption and subjective responses during lifting tasks.

Authors:  Xishuai Qu; Chenxi Qu; Tao Ma; Peng Yin; Ning Zhao; Yumeng Xia; Shengguan Qu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Applicability of an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton to Carrying Activities.

Authors:  Tommaso Poliero; Maria Lazzaroni; Stefano Toxiri; Christian Di Natali; Darwin G Caldwell; Jesús Ortiz
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-12-09

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.

Authors:  Ali Golabchi; Andrew Chao; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Characterizing the comfort limits of forces applied to the shoulders, thigh and shank to inform exosuit design.

Authors:  Matthew B Yandell; David M Ziemnicki; Kirsty A McDonald; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low-profile elastic exosuit reduces back muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Juliana C Soltys; Keaton L Scherpereel; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.538

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.