Literature DB >> 16494682

Reward-period activity in primate dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal neurons is affected by reward schedules.

Satoe Ichihara-Takeda1, Shintaro Funahashi.   

Abstract

Reward-period activity observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is thought to represent the detection of reward delivery. To investigate whether this activity plays the same role in these areas, we examined this activity under different reward schedules and whether the reward schedule has similar effects on this activity in each of these areas. A monkey performed an oculomotor delayed-response (ODR) task under two reward schedules. In the ODR-1 schedule, the monkey received a large amount of reward only after four successful trials, whereas in the ODR-2 schedule, it received a small amount of reward after every successful trial. Although reward-period activity was observed in both areas, more neurons exhibited this activity in the OFC. Reward-period activity was modulated by the proximity to reward delivery in both areas and this feature was observed more frequently in the OFC. The onset time of this activity also gradually advanced depending on the proximity to reward delivery. Moreover, many OFC neurons with this activity responded to free reward delivery. These results indicate that reward-period activity in the OFC represents the detection of reward delivery and that the gradual change in the magnitude and the onset time of this activity represents the expectation of reward delivery. Similar features of reward-period activity were observed in DLPFC neurons, although a significant number of DLPFC neurons did not respond to free reward delivery and no advance was observed in the onset time of this activity. These results suggest that reward-period activity in the DLPFC participates in whether or not correct performance was achieved. Thus, although similar reward-period activity was observed in both areas, the activity in the OFC represents the detection of reward delivery and is affected by the monkey's motivational state, whereas that in the DLPFC seems to participate in monitoring whether or not the necessary performance is achieved.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16494682     DOI: 10.1162/089892906775783679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

1.  Neural coding of reward magnitude in the orbitofrontal cortex of the rat during a five-odor olfactory discrimination task.

Authors:  Esther van Duuren; Francisco A Nieto Escámez; Ruud N J M A Joosten; Rein Visser; Antonius B Mulder; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Population coding of reward magnitude in the orbitofrontal cortex of the rat.

Authors:  Esther van Duuren; Jan Lankelma; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neuronal firing rate, inter-neuron correlation and synchrony in area MT are correlated with directional choices during stimulus and reward expectation.

Authors:  A Thiele; K-P Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Clinical symptoms and alpha band resting-state functional connectivity imaging in patients with schizophrenia: implications for novel approaches to treatment.

Authors:  Leighton B N Hinkley; Sophia Vinogradov; Adrian G Guggisberg; Melissa Fisher; Anne M Findlay; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Neural Correlates of Strategy Switching in the Macaque Orbital Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Valeria Fascianelli; Lorenzo Ferrucci; Satoshi Tsujimoto; Aldo Genovesio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Encoding of both positive and negative reward prediction errors by neurons of the primate lateral prefrontal cortex and caudate nucleus.

Authors:  Wael F Asaad; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Heterogeneity of reward mechanisms.

Authors:  A Lajtha; H Sershen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  Δ(9)Tetrahydrocannabinol impairs reversal learning but not extra-dimensional shifts in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  M J Wright; S A Vandewater; L H Parsons; M A Taffe
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Value-based modulations in human visual cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Learning substrates in the primate prefrontal cortex and striatum: sustained activity related to successful actions.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Anitha Pasupathy; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.