Literature DB >> 16494678

Delayed response to animate implied motion in human motion processing areas.

Jeannette A M Lorteije1, J Leon Kenemans, Tjeerd Jellema, Rob H J van der Lubbe, Frederiek de Heer, Richard J A van Wezel.   

Abstract

Viewing static photographs of objects in motion evokes higher fMRI activation in the human medial temporal complex (MT+) than looking at similar photographs without this implied motion. As MT+ is traditionally thought to be involved in motion perception (and not in form perception), this finding suggests feedback from object-recognition areas onto MT+. To investigate this hypothesis, we recorded extracranial potentials evoked by the sight of photographs of biological agents with and without implied motion. The difference in potential between responses to pictures with and without implied motion was maximal between 260 and 400 msec after stimulus onset. Source analysis of this difference revealed one bilateral, symmetrical dipole pair in the occipital lobe. This area also showed a response to real motion, but approximately 100 msec earlier than the implied motion response. The longer latency of the implied motion response in comparison to the real motion response is consistent with a feedback projection onto MT+ following object recognition in higher-level temporal areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16494678     DOI: 10.1162/089892906775783732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Event-related repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior superior temporal sulcus improves the detection of threatening postural changes in human bodies.

Authors:  Matteo Candidi; Bernard M C Stienen; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation over MT/MST fails to impair judgments of implied motion.

Authors:  James L Alford; Paul van Donkelaar; Paul Dassonville; Richard T Marrocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Time perception of action photographs is more precise than that of still photographs.

Authors:  Alessandro Moscatelli; Laura Polito; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Action recognition by motion detection in posture space.

Authors:  Stefanie Theusner; Marc de Lussanet; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Nathan Faivre; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Time dilation caused by static images with implied motion.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamamoto; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  On the perception of probable things: neural substrates of associative memory, imagery, and perception.

Authors:  Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Implied motion perception from a still image in infancy.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Observing expertise-related actions leads to perfect time flow estimations.

Authors:  Yin-Hua Chen; Fabio Pizzolato; Paola Cesari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.