Literature DB >> 16494542

Laparoscopic gastric and biliary bypass: a single-center cohort prospective study.

Ali M Ghanem1, Ayman M Hamade, Ali J Sheen, Anas Owera, Ahmed Z Al-Bahrani, Basil J Ammori.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Relief of gastric outlet and distal biliary obstruction may be accomplished by open surgery or by minimally invasive techniques including endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches. We examined the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic gastric and biliary bypass in all patients with malignant and benign disease requiring surgical relief of obstructive symptoms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with benign duodenal stricture or inoperable malignancy underwent therapeutic laparoscopic bypass surgery. Prophylactic gastric or biliary bypass was added in selected patients with nonmetastatic malignancy.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (17 of them female) with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-81 years) underwent 29 laparoscopic bypass procedures for malignant (n = 23) or benign (n = 6) disease. One patient who underwent a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced ulcer disease developed stenosis of the stoma that required laparoscopic refashioning 2 months later, accounting for the 29th procedure reported herein in 28 patients. Surgery included the construction of a single gastric (n = 16) or biliary (n = 5) bypass or a double bypass (n = 8), and an additional prophylactic bypass in 5 of 23 cancer patients (21.8%). All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The median operative time was 90 minutes (range, 60-153 minutes) and mean postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3-6 days). Complications developed following 4 procedures (13.8%) and 1 patient died (3.4%). No complications occurred in patients with prophylactic bypass. One patient required laparoscopic revision of the gastroenterostomy 2 months postoperatively, for benign disease. No recurrence of obstructive symptoms was observed in cancer patients during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic bypass surgery for distal biliary and gastric obstruction in patients with benign or malignant disease results in low morbidity and mortality and short postoperative hospital stay. The addition of prophylactic bypass in patients with nonmetastatic unresectable malignancy appears safe and effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16494542     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic stenting versus surgical gastroenterostomy for palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Hosono; Hiroshi Ohtani; Yuichi Arimoto; Yoshitetsu Kanamiya
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Role of the laparoscopic approach to biliary bypass for benign and malignant biliary diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zaher Toumi; Moayad Aljarabah; Basil J Ammori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic biliary bypass for malignant obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  Hong Yu; Shuodong Wu; Xiaopeng Yu; Jinyan Han; Dianbo Yao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Efficacy of endoscopic self-expandable metal stent placement versus surgical bypass for inoperable pancreatic cancer-related malignant biliary obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ka Wing Ma; Albert Chi Yan Chan; Wong Hoi She; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok; Wing Chiu Dai; Simon Tsang; Tan To Cheung; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Surgical bypass vs. endoscopic stenting for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Edwina N Scott; Giuseppe Garcea; Helena Doucas; Will P Steward; Ashley R Dennison; David P Berry
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy: case report.

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; François Pugin; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Surgical bypass versus endoscopic stenting for malignant gastroduodenal obstruction: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Ali Siddiqui; Stuart J Spechler; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Double Stenting for Malignant Biliary and Duodenal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Fábián; Renáta Bor; Noémi Gede; Péter Bacsur; Dániel Pécsi; Péter Hegyi; Barbara Tóth; Zsolt Szakács; Áron Vincze; István Ruzsics; Zoltán Rakonczay; Bálint Erőss; Róbert Sepp; Zoltán Szepes
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.396

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.