Literature DB >> 16493629

Multiscale modeling of macromolecular conformational changes combining concepts from rigidity and elastic network theory.

Aqeel Ahmed1, Holger Gohlke.   

Abstract

The development of a two-step approach for multiscale modeling of macromolecular conformational changes is based on recent developments in rigidity and elastic network theory. In the first step, static properties of the macromolecule are determined by decomposing the molecule into rigid clusters by using the graph-theoretical approach FIRST and an all-atom representation of the protein. In this way, rigid clusters are not limited to consist of residues adjacent in sequence or secondary structure elements as in previous studies. Furthermore, flexible links between rigid clusters are identified and can be modeled as such subsequently. In the second step, dynamical properties of the molecule are revealed by the rotations-translations of blocks approach (RTB) using an elastic network model representation of the coarse-grained protein. In this step, only rigid body motions are allowed for rigid clusters, whereas links between them are treated as fully flexible. The approach was tested on a data set of 10 proteins that showed conformational changes on ligand binding. For efficiency, coarse-graining the protein results in a remarkable reduction of memory requirements and computational times by factors of 9 and 27 on average and up to 25 and 125, respectively. For accuracy, directions and magnitudes of motions predicted by our approach agree well with experimentally determined ones, despite embracing in extreme cases >50% of the protein into one rigid cluster. In fact, the results of our method are in general comparable with when no or a uniform coarse-graining is applied; and the results are superior if the movement is dominated by loop or fragment motions. This finding indicates that explicitly distinguishing between flexible and rigid regions is advantageous when using a simplified protein representation in the second step. Finally, motions of atoms in rigid clusters are also well predicted by our approach, which points to the need to consider mobile protein regions in addition to flexible ones when modeling correlated motions. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16493629     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  20 in total

1.  A natural coarse graining for simulating large biomolecular motion.

Authors:  Holger Gohlke; M F Thorpe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Analyzing the flexibility of RNA structures by constraint counting.

Authors:  Simone Fulle; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  StoneHinge: hinge prediction by network analysis of individual protein structures.

Authors:  Kevin S Keating; Samuel C Flores; Mark B Gerstein; Leslie A Kuhn
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  As-Rigid-As-Possible molecular interpolation paths.

Authors:  Minh Khoa Nguyen; Léonard Jaillet; Stéphane Redon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the impact of mutations in SOD1 on its conformational properties associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as revealed with molecular modelling.

Authors:  Nikolay A Alemasov; Nikita V Ivanisenko; Srinivasan Ramachandran; Vladimir A Ivanisenko
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2018-02-05

6.  Coarse grained normal mode analysis vs. refined Gaussian Network Model for protein residue-level structural fluctuations.

Authors:  Jun-Koo Park; Robert Jernigan; Zhijun Wu
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 7.  Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.

Authors:  Ales Prokop; Jeffrey M Davidson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Optimal identification of semi-rigid domains in macromolecules from molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Stefan Bernhard; Frank Noé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design.

Authors:  Pietro Cozzini; Glen E Kellogg; Francesca Spyrakis; Donald J Abraham; Gabriele Costantino; Andrew Emerson; Francesca Fanelli; Holger Gohlke; Leslie A Kuhn; Garrett M Morris; Modesto Orozco; Thelma A Pertinhez; Menico Rizzi; Christoph A Sotriffer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Computational methods for predicting sites of functionally important dynamics.

Authors:  Adam D Schuyler; Heather A Carlson; Eva L Feldman
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.