Literature DB >> 16493219

Efficacy of dretler stone cone in the treatment of ureteral stones with pneumatic lithotripsy.

M Gonen1, A Cenker, O Istanbulluoglu, H Ozkardes.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy has been used to treat ureteral calculi for more than 10 years. Owing to its low price and high degree of effectiveness, it has become the most popular ureteroscopic lithotripsy device in use worldwide. The major limitation of the technique is the occurrence of proximal fragment migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy. The Dretler Stone Cone is a new device developed to prevent stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this device during ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients having ureteral stones were treated with a 10-Fr semirigid ureteroscope, a Stone Cone Nitinol Retrieval Device, and a pneumatic lithotriptor. In all patients Stone Cones were placed under visual guidance through the working channel of the ureteroscope. Outcomes of this device were then compared with the outcomes of 23 previous patients with stones of similar sizes and locations who had undergone ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy prior to the Stone Cone being available at our clinic.
RESULTS: All patients in the study group were stone-free after the procedure. No stone fragments were noted to migrate to proximal segments.
CONCLUSIONS: The Dretler Stone Cone effectively prevents proximal stone migration and facilitates stone fragmentation during pneumatic lithotripsy with no risk of ureteral injury. It has only a small extra cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16493219     DOI: 10.1159/000090881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

1.  Dual usage of a stone basket: Stone capture and retropulsion prevention.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Daniela Ghiculete; Robert Sowerby; Michael Ordon; Jason Y Lee; Kenneth T Pace; John R Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscope with lithoclast.

Authors:  Ehab R Tawfick
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-01-28

Review 4.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Michael P Kurtz; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Comparison of Stone Retrieval Basket, Stone Cone and Holmium Laser: Which One Is Better in Retropulsion and Stone-Free Status for Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi?

Authors:  Farzad Allameh; Mohammadreza Razzaghi; Morteza Fallah-Karkan; Behnam Hosseini; Ali Tayyebi Azar; Arash Ranjbar; Amir Hossein Rahavian; Saleh Ghiasy
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-06

6.  Use of XenX™, the latest ureteric occlusion device with guide wire utility: results from a prospective multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Francesco Sanguedolce; Emanuele Montanari; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Nicola Macchione; Stephan Hruby; Athanasios Papatsoris; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Luca Villa; Patrick Honeck; Olivier Traxer; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Use of a modified ureteral access sheath in semi-rigid ureteroscopy to treat large upper ureteral stones is associated with high stone free rates.

Authors:  Jad Khaled AlSmadi; Xiaohang Li; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-01-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.