Literature DB >> 16493103

Policies and practices related to the role of board certification and recertification of pediatricians in hospital privileging.

Gary L Freed1, Rebecca L Uren, Ericka J Hudson, Indu Lakhani, John R C Wheeler, James A Stockman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Privileging involves the granting of permission to perform specific professional activities under the jurisdiction of a governing body's (hospital) authority. In 1951, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals (later renamed the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) was formed to codify the process of hospital assessment. In the early part of the 20th century, a parallel process was being undertaken by the medical specialties to evaluate and recognize competence among physicians through the creation of specialty boards.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of board certification in hospital privileging policies for general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists and to identify any variation among types of hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A telephone survey between January 1 and June 30, 2005, of privileging personnel among a random, weighted sample of 200 nonspecialty hospitals stratified by teaching status, children's vs general hospitals, freestanding children's hospital vs part of hospital system, and urban vs rural location. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of hospitals that require board certification at initial privileging or at some point to maintain privileges and recertification to maintain privileges.
RESULTS: Of 200 hospitals, 7 hospitals were ineligible because they did not have at least 1 pediatrician on staff. One hundred fifty-nine hospitals completed the telephone interview, resulting in an overall response rate of 82%. A total of 124 (78%) of 159 hospitals did not require general pediatricians to be board certified at initial privileging; however, 111 (70%) did require pediatricians to become board certified at some point during their tenure. Of these 124 hospitals, 52 (42%) did not report a time frame in which certification must be achieved. Forty-nine (43%) of 113 hospitals required pediatric subspecialists to achieve subspecialty certification within a specific time frame.
CONCLUSIONS: These results raise issues regarding the manner in which board certification is used or not used by hospitals in their efforts to ensure the practice of high-quality care within their institutions. The premise for recertification is the need to assure the public of continued competence of physicians over the course of their professional careers. Increased attention by the public and regulatory agencies regarding patient safety and quality of care will likely have an impact on hospital privileging processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16493103     DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.8.905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  4 in total

1.  Professionalism and accountability: the role of specialty board certification.

Authors:  Christine K Cassel; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2008

2.  Provider Board Certification Status and Practice Patterns in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter M Fleischut; Jonathan M Eskreis-Winkler; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Gregory P Giambrone; Xian Wu; Xuming Sun; Cynthia A Lien; Susan L Faggiani; Richard P Dutton; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Do early career indicators of clinical skill predict subsequent career outcomes and practice characteristics for general internists?

Authors:  Bradley Gray; James Reschovsky; Eric Holmboe; Rebecca Lipner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Trust in residents and board examinations: when sharing crosses the boundary.

Authors:  Gregory W Ruhnke; David J Doukas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.616

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.