Literature DB >> 16493062

Clonal competition inhibits the proliferation and differentiation of adoptively transferred TCR transgenic CD4 T cells in response to infection.

Kathryn E Foulds1, Hao Shen.   

Abstract

CD4 and CD8 T cells have been shown to proliferate and differentiate to different extents following antigenic stimulation. CD4 T cells form a heterogenous pool of effector cells in various stages of division and differentiation, while nearly all responding CD8 T cells divide and differentiate to the same extent. We examined CD4 and CD8 T cell responses during bacterial infection by adoptive transfer of CFSE-labeled monoclonal and polyclonal T cells. Monoclonal and polyclonal CD8 T cells both divided extensively, whereas monoclonal CD4 T cells underwent limited division in comparison with polyclonal CD4 T cells. Titration studies revealed that the limited proliferation of transferred monoclonal CD4 T cells was due to inhibition by a high precursor frequency of clonal T cells. This unusually high precursor frequency of clonal CD4 T cells also inhibited the differentiation of these cells. These results suggest that the adoptive transfer of TCR transgenic CD4 T cells significantly underestimates the extent of proliferation and differentiation of CD4 T cells following infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16493062     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.5.3037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  42 in total

Review 1.  TCR signaling requirements for activating T cells and for generating memory.

Authors:  Dietmar Zehn; Carolyn King; Michael J Bevan; Ed Palmer
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  The persistence of T cell memory.

Authors:  Mark A Daniels; Emma Teixeiro
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Competition for antigen determines the stability of T cell-dendritic cell interactions during clonal expansion.

Authors:  Zacarias Garcia; Emmanuelle Pradelli; Susanna Celli; Hélène Beuneu; Aurélie Simon; Philippe Bousso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Increased competition for antigen during priming negatively impacts the generation of memory CD4 T cells.

Authors:  David A Blair; Leo Lefrançois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rapid culling of the CD4+ T cell repertoire in the transition from effector to memory.

Authors:  Matthew A Williams; Eugene V Ravkov; Michael J Bevan
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  Naive CD4(+) T cell frequency varies for different epitopes and predicts repertoire diversity and response magnitude.

Authors:  James J Moon; H Hamlet Chu; Marion Pepper; Stephen J McSorley; Stephen C Jameson; Ross M Kedl; Marc K Jenkins
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  Conference summary.

Authors:  Philippa Marrack
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2007-08-15

8.  Antigen-specific T-T interactions regulate CD4 T-cell expansion.

Authors:  Julie Helft; Alexandra Jacquet; Nathalie T Joncker; Isabelle Grandjean; Guillaume Dorothée; Adrien Kissenpfennig; Bernard Malissen; Polly Matzinger; Olivier Lantz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Increasing the CD4+ T cell precursor frequency leads to competition for IFN-gamma thereby degrading memory cell quantity and quality.

Authors:  Jason K Whitmire; Nicola Benning; Boreth Eam; J Lindsay Whitton
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  The magnitude of CD4+ T cell recall responses is controlled by the duration of the secondary stimulus.

Authors:  Eugene V Ravkov; Matthew A Williams
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.