Literature DB >> 16492826

Determinants of volatile general anesthetic potency: a preliminary three-dimensional pharmacophore for halogenated anesthetics.

Jason C Sewell1, John W Sear.   

Abstract

We investigated the molecular basis for the immobilizing activity of halogenated volatile anesthetics using comparative molecular field analysis. In vivo potency data (expressed as minimum alveolar concentrations) for 69 structurally diverse anesthetics were obtained from the literature. The drugs were randomly divided into a training set (n = 52) used to derive the activity model and a test set (n = 17) used to independently assess the model's predictive power. The anesthetic structures were aligned so as to maximize their similarity in molecular shape and electrostatic potential to the most potent drug in the group, CF2H-(CF2)3-CH2OH. The conformers and alignments of the anesthetics with maximum similarity (calculated as Carbo indices) were retained and used to derive the comparative molecular field analysis models. The final model explained 94.2% of the variance in the observed activities of the training set compounds. The model showed good predictive capability for both the training set (cross-validated r2 = 0.705) and randomly excluded test set anesthetics (r2 = 0.837). Three-dimensional pharmacophoric maps were derived to identify the spatial distribution of key areas where steric and electrostatic interactions are important in determining immobilizing activity of the halogenated drugs and were compared with our previously published maps obtained for nonhalogenated volatile anesthetics.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16492826     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195421.46107.d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of the molecular bases for N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor inhibition versus immobilizing activities of volatile aromatic anesthetics.

Authors:  Jason C Sewell; Douglas E Raines; Edmond I Eger; Michael J Laster; John W Sear
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  A hypothesis on the origin and evolution of the response to inhaled anesthetics.

Authors:  James M Sonner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

Authors:  Edmond I Eger; Douglas E Raines; Steven L Shafer; Hugh C Hemmings; James M Sonner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The biological and toxicological activity of gases and vapors.

Authors:  Michael H Abraham; Ricardo Sánchez-Moreno; Javier Gil-Lostes; William E Acree; J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William S Cain
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  In Silico Discovery of Novel Potent Antioxidants on the Basis of Pulvinic Acid and Coumarine Derivatives and Their Experimental Evaluation.

Authors:  Rok Martinčič; Janez Mravljak; Urban Švajger; Andrej Perdih; Marko Anderluh; Marjana Novič
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Molecular Mechanisms of Anesthetic Action: Updates and Cutting Edge Developments from the Field of Molecular Modeling.

Authors:  Edward J Bertaccini
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-07-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.