Literature DB >> 16492813

A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus conventional therapy for sedation and hemodynamic control during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia.

Craig A McCutcheon1, Ruari M Orme, David A Scott, Michael J Davies, Desmond P McGlade.   

Abstract

The properties of dexmedetomidine (DEX) that result in titratable sedation and sympathetic modulation suggest that it would be suitable for use during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under regional anesthesia. We performed a randomized, double-blind study in 56 patients having CEA under regional anesthesia and compared hemodynamic control using DEX versus a conventional sedation technique using midazolam and fentanyl standard (STD). Sedation was titrated to a Ramsay Sedation Score of 2-4 in both groups. The primary outcome was the number of pharmacological interventions required to treat deviations of arterial blood pressure and heart rate outside of predetermined limits. We also compared recovery hemodynamic profiles, patient satisfaction, and adverse cardiac and neurological events. There was no difference in the overall rate of hemodynamic interventions (DEX 80% versus STD 79%; P = 1.0). However, the nature of interventions differed in that patients in the DEX group were less likely to require treatment for hypertension and/or tachycardia (DEX 40% versus STD 72%; P = 0.03). The number of interventions per patient for hypertension and/or tachycardia was also lesser in the DEX group (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the numbers of patients needing intraoperative treatment for hypotension or bradycardia or in the need for intraarterial shunting. In the postanesthesia care unit, more patients in the DEX group required hemodynamic drug interventions (DEX 11, 44%, versus STD 4, 14%; P = 0.03). These were primarily for hypotension (DEX 7, 28% versus STD 3, 11%; P = 0.16). The number of patients requiring no additional pain relief in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly larger for patients in the DEX group (DEX 18, 72% versus STD 11, 38%; P = 0.027). DEX provides an acceptable alternative, without superiority to standard techniques for sedation during awake CEA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16492813     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197777.62397.d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  25 in total

1.  Influence of dexmedetomidine on cardiac complications in non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Shuan Jin; Xueyue Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-06-28

Review 2.  Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy - general or loco-regional?

Authors:  Claudiu Zdrehuş
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-04

3.  [Importance of instrument-based neuromonitoring during carotid surgery using regional anesthesia].

Authors:  A Koköfer; J Nawratil; M Opperer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Regional Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine Infusion: A Feasible Method for the Awake Test during Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Jonggeun Lee; Up Huh; Seunghwan Song; Sung Woon Chung; Sang Min Sung; Han Jin Cho
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2016-10-11

5.  Low-dose dexmedetomidine provides hemodynamics stabilization during emergence and recovery from general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Shogo Tsujikawa; Kazutoshi Ikeshita
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Update on dexmedetomidine: use in nonintubated patients requiring sedation for surgical procedures.

Authors:  Mohanad Shukry; Jeffrey A Miller
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Effects of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Infusion on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate during Cardiac Surgery in Children.

Authors:  Jyrson Guilherme Klamt; Walter Villela de Andrade Vicente; Luis Vicente Garcia; Cesar Augusto Ferreira
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-08-19

8.  Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Sedation for Percutaneous Drainage of Hepatic Hydatid Cysts.

Authors:  Emine Nilgün Bavullu; Esra Aksoy; Ruslan Abdullayev; Nermin Göğüş; Doğan Dede
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2013-05-23

9.  A study of cognitive dysfunction in patients having carotid endarterectomy performed with regional anesthesia.

Authors:  Eric J Heyer; Mark I Gold; E Will Kirby; Joseph Zurica; Elizabeth Mitchell; Hadi J Halazun; Lauren Teverbaugh; Robert R Sciacca; Robert A Solomon; Donald O Quest; Thomas S Maldonado; Thomas S Riles; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam as a sedation agent with local anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Mishina; T Aiba; K Hiramatsu; Y Shibata; M Yoshihara; T Aoba; N Yamaguchi; T Kato
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.