Literature DB >> 1649267

A randomized trial of alternating chemotherapy versus best supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

R Cellerino1, D Tummarello, F Guidi, P Isidori, M Raspugli, B Biscottini, G Fatati.   

Abstract

From April 1985 to September 1988, 128 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial evaluating chemotherapy (arm A) versus best supportive care (arm B). Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 IV day 1 (CE'P regimen) alternating every 4 weeks with methotrexate 30 mg/m2 IV day 1, etoposide 200 mg/m2 IV day 1, and lomustine (CCNU) 70 mg/m2 orally day 1 (MEC' regimen) until progression. Of the 123 patients (62 treated and 61 controls) eligible for survival, 115 were fully evaluable for response (58 treated and 57 controls). Response rates were 21% partial response, 53% stable disease, and 26% progressive disease in arm A, and 47% stable disease and 53% progressive disease in arm B. Median survival was 34.3 weeks (range, 4.3 to 218.6+ weeks) in arm A versus 21.1 weeks (range, 4.3 to 188.6 weeks) in arm B; the difference was not significant at P = .153 (Mantel-Cox). Subgroups of patients retrospectively analyzed by age, performance status, stage M0/M1, and weight loss or not showed no significant difference in survival. Poor-risk patients (at least two of the following: poor performance status, stage M1, weight loss) of arm A survived significantly longer than poor-risk patients of arm B (23.6 weeks v 12.4 weeks, Mantel-Cox P = .008); a significant difference in survival was also observed between nonsquamous cell patients of arm A and those of arm B (median survival, 38.6 weeks v 16.7 weeks; Mantel-Cox P = .041). Toxicity on the chemotherapy arm was hematologic (World Health Organization [WHO] grade greater than 3) in 12% of CE'P and in 13% of MEC' courses and gastroenteric (WHO grade greater than 3) in 24% of CE'P courses and in 8% of MEC' courses. Our alternating treatment was not significantly superior to supportive care. It is likely that certain subgroups of the NSCLC category may have an advantage with chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1649267     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.8.1453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C J Sweeney; A B Sandler
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Why does a higher response rate to chemotherapy correlate poorly with improved survival?

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The difficulty defining "benefit" of new antineoplastic strategies.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Is the use of chemotherapy justified in non-small-cell lung cancer?

Authors:  P Kelly; L Clancy
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Comparison of vinorelbine-Cisplatin with gemcitabine-Cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sevket Ozkaya; Serhat Findik; Oguz Uzun; Atilla Guven Atici; Levent Erkan
Journal:  Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med       Date:  2008-04-18

8.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation (EGFR) Testing for Prediction of Response to EGFR-Targeting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Drugs in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 9.  Lung cancer: a review of current therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  A B Sandler; A C Buzaid
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.584

10.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.