Literature DB >> 16492164

Comparison of biophysical and biologic properties of alpha-helical enantiomeric antimicrobial peptides.

Yuxin Chen1, Adriana I Vasil, Linda Rehaume, Colin T Mant, Jane L Burns, Michael L Vasil, Robert E W Hancock, Robert S Hodges.   

Abstract

In our previous study (Chen et al. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:12316-12329), we utilized an alpha-helical antimicrobial peptide V(681) as the framework to study the effects of peptide hydrophobicity, amphipathicity, and helicity on biologic activities where we obtained several V(681) analogs with dramatic improvement in peptide therapeutic indices against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. In the present study, the D-enantiomers of three peptides--V(681), V13A(D) and V13K(L) were synthesized to compare biophysical and biologic properties with their enantiomeric isomers. Each D-enantiomer was shown by circular dichroism spectroscopy to be a mirror image of the corresponding L-isomer in benign conditions and in the presence of 50% trifluoroethanol. L- and D-enantiomers exhibited equivalent antimicrobial activities against a diverse group of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, various gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria and a fungus. In addition, L- and D-enantiomeric peptides were equally active in their ability to lyse human red blood cells. The similar activity of L- and D-enantiomeric peptides on prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell membranes suggests that there are no chiral receptors and the cell membrane is the sole target for these peptides. Peptide D-V13K(D) showed significant improvements in the therapeutic indices compared with the parent peptide V(681) by 53-fold against P. aeruginosa strains, 80-fold against gram-negative bacteria, 69-fold against gram-positive bacteria, and 33-fold against Candida albicans. The excellent stability of D-enantiomers to trypsin digestion (no proteolysis by trypsin) compared with the rapid breakdown of the L-enantiomers highlights the advantage of the D-enantiomers and their potential as clinical therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16492164      PMCID: PMC3252236          DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2006.00349.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des        ISSN: 1747-0277            Impact factor:   2.817


  50 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?

Authors:  Kim A Brogden
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Antimicrobial peptides: premises and promises.

Authors:  K V R Reddy; R D Yedery; C Aranha
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Rational design of alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides with enhanced activities and specificity/therapeutic index.

Authors:  Yuxin Chen; Colin T Mant; Susan W Farmer; Robert E W Hancock; Michael L Vasil; Robert S Hodges
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Determination of intrinsic hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of amino acid side chains in peptides in the absence of nearest-neighbor or conformational effects.

Authors:  James M Kovacs; Colin T Mant; Robert S Hodges
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Influence of gentamicin and tobramycin on binary biofilm formation by co-cultures of Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Amal G Al-Bakri; Peter Gilbert; David G Allison
Journal:  J Basic Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.281

Review 6.  Nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: epidemiology and treatment options.

Authors:  Marilee D Obritsch; Douglas N Fish; Robert MacLaren; Rose Jung
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and device-related nosocomial infections: implications, trends, and potential approaches for control.

Authors:  George E Pierce
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 8.  Antimicrobial peptides: new candidates in the fight against bacterial infections.

Authors:  Orsolya Toke
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Antimicrobial peptide therapeutics for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhang; Jody Parente; Scott M Harris; Donald E Woods; Robert E W Hancock; Timothy J Falla
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Current guidelines for the treatment of severe pneumonia and sepsis.

Authors:  K F Bodmann
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.544

View more
  44 in total

1.  Knowledge-based computational methods for identifying or designing novel, non-homologous antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Davor Juretić; Damir Vukičević; Dražen Petrov; Mario Novković; Viktor Bojović; Bono Lučić; Nada Ilić; Alessandro Tossi
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 2.  Cationic amphiphiles, a new generation of antimicrobials inspired by the natural antimicrobial peptide scaffold.

Authors:  Brandon Findlay; George G Zhanel; Frank Schweizer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Role of peptide hydrophobicity in the mechanism of action of alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Yuxin Chen; Michael T Guarnieri; Adriana I Vasil; Michael L Vasil; Colin T Mant; Robert S Hodges
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography collection efficiency for an antimicrobial peptide on columns of varying diameters (1mm to 9.4mm I.D.).

Authors:  Yuxin Chen; Colin T Mant; Robert S Hodges
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Effects of net charge and the number of positively charged residues on the biological activity of amphipathic alpha-helical cationic antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Ziqing Jiang; Adriana I Vasil; John D Hale; Robert E W Hancock; Michael L Vasil; Robert S Hodges
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Structure-guided RP-HPLC chromatography of diastereomeric α-helical peptide analogs substituted with single amino acid stereoisomers.

Authors:  Yibing Huang; Ling Pan; Lianjing Zhao; Colin T Mant; Robert S Hodges; Yuxin Chen
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  Novel method to identify the optimal antimicrobial peptide in a combination matrix, using anoplin as an example.

Authors:  J K Munk; C Ritz; F P Fliedner; N Frimodt-Møller; P R Hansen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effects of D-Lysine Substitutions on the Activity and Selectivity of Antimicrobial Peptide CM15.

Authors:  Heather M Kaminski; Jimmy B Feix
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  A D-peptide analog of the second extracellular loop of claudin-3 and -4 leads to mislocalized claudin and cellular apoptosis in mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Heidi K Baumgartner; Neal Beeman; Robert S Hodges; Margaret C Neville
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.817

Review 10.  Lipid-packing perturbation of model membranes by pH-responsive antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Dayane S Alvares; Taisa Giordano Viegas; João Ruggiero Neto
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.