Literature DB >> 16491513

Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Blake C Ballif1, Catherine D Kashork, Reza Saleki, Emily Rorem, Kyle Sundin, Bassem A Bejjani, Lisa G Shaffer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) has moved to the forefront of molecular cytogenetics with its ability to rapidly characterize chromosome abnormalities at resolutions much higher than routine chromosome banding. However, array CGH, like all CGH procedures, has heretofore been deemed unable to detect ploidy, a major cause of fetal demise and spontaneous miscarriage.
METHOD: We recently developed a CGH microarray that is designed for detecting aneuploidy and unbalanced chromosome rearrangements. Here, we introduce the use of a Klinefelter male cell line (47,XXY) as a control for array CGH analyses on products of conception (POCs).
RESULTS: This approach facilitates the detection of common trisomies and monosomies of the sex chromosomes by reducing the analysis to the identification of single copy gains or losses. Furthermore, in a blinded study, careful interpretation of the microarray results with particular attention to the sex chromosome ratios between the patient sample and the control allowed for the detection of some common triploidies.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that using a chromosomally abnormal cell line in array CGH analysis can be applied to other CGH platforms and that array CGH, when properly performed and analyzed, is a powerful tool that can detect most chromosomal abnormalities observed in a clinical setting including some polyploidies. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491513     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  15 in total

1.  Microarray analysis of copy number variation in single cells.

Authors:  Peter Konings; Evelyne Vanneste; Sigrun Jackmaert; Michèle Ampe; Geert Verbeke; Yves Moreau; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cédric Le Caignec; Michèle Ampe; Peter Konings; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Mustapha Amyere; Miikka Vikkula; Frans Schuit; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Geert Verbeke; Thomas D'Hooghe; Yves Moreau; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Genomic characteristics of miscarriage copy number variants.

Authors:  Hani Bagheri; Eloi Mercier; Ying Qiao; Mary D Stephenson; Evica Rajcan-Separovic
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Molecular analysis of products of conception obtained by hysteroembryoscopy from infertile couples.

Authors:  Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Sandra García-Herrero; José Antonio Martínez-Conejero; Jaime Ferro; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Identification of aneuploidy in dogs screened by a SNP microarray.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Bradley Hopp; Marek Switonski; Adam Zahand; Blake C Ballif
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Identification of origin of unknown derivative chromosomes by array-based comparative genomic hybridization using pre- and postnatal clinical samples.

Authors:  Jin Choe; Jae-Ku Kang; Chang-Jun Bae; Dong-Suk Lee; Doyeong Hwang; Ki-Chul Kim; Woong-Yang Park; Jong-Ho Lee; Jeong-Sun Seo
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Natasa Dzidic; Michelle N Strecker; Sara Commander; Mary K Travis; Charles Doherty; R Weslie Tyson; Arturo E Mendoza; Mary Stephenson; Craig A Dise; Carlos W Benito; Mandolin S Ziadie; Karine Hovanes
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Optimizing the Diagnostic Strategy to Identify Genetic Abnormalities in Miscarriage.

Authors:  Myungshin Kim; In Yang Park; Jong-Mi Lee; So Young Shin; Guk Won Kim; Woo Jeng Kim; Jeong Ha Wie; Subeen Hong; Dain Kang; Hayoung Choi; Jisook Yim; Yonggoo Kim
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Jinsong Gao; Congcong Liu; Fengxia Yao; Na Hao; Jing Zhou; Qian Zhou; Liang Zhang; Xinyan Liu; Xuming Bian; Juntao Liu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Mindy P Dabell; Allan J Fisher; Justine Coppinger; Anne M Bandholz; Jay W Ellison; J Britt Ravnan; Beth S Torchia; Blake C Ballif; Jill A Rosenfeld
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.