Mei-Ling Chen1, Ho-Ching Tseng. 1. Graduate Institute of Nursing, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan. mechenl@mail.cgu.edu.tw
Abstract
GOALS OF WORK: Cancer patients often experience multiple symptoms, many of which have been reported to correlate with each other. The goals of this study were to understand which cancer-related symptoms cluster together and to test the conceptual meanings of the revealed symptom clusters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with various cancer diagnoses (N=151) were recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan. The 13-item M.D. Anderson symptom inventory was used to assess patients' symptom severity. Selected symptoms were factored using principal-axis factoring with oblique rotation. The known-group technique was used to validate the conceptual meanings of revealed factors. MAIN RESULTS: Patients' symptom severity ratings fit a three-factor solution that explained 55% of the variance. These three factors (symptom clusters) were named sickness symptom cluster, gastrointestinal symptom cluster, and emotional symptom cluster. Patients with pain and with advanced diseases had significantly higher mean scores in the sickness symptom cluster than patients without pain and with earlier-stage diseases. The patients' functional status was negatively correlated with mean scores in the sickness symptom cluster. Patients under chemotherapy demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in the gastrointestinal symptom cluster than patients under other treatments. Patients with anxiety or depression also had significantly higher mean scores in the emotional symptom cluster than patients without anxiety or depression. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified three underlying symptom clusters and verified their conceptual meaning in cancer patients. Knowing these symptom clusters may help healthcare professionals understand plausible mechanisms for the aggregation of symptoms.
GOALS OF WORK: Cancerpatients often experience multiple symptoms, many of which have been reported to correlate with each other. The goals of this study were to understand which cancer-related symptoms cluster together and to test the conceptual meanings of the revealed symptom clusters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with various cancer diagnoses (N=151) were recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan. The 13-item M.D. Anderson symptom inventory was used to assess patients' symptom severity. Selected symptoms were factored using principal-axis factoring with oblique rotation. The known-group technique was used to validate the conceptual meanings of revealed factors. MAIN RESULTS:Patients' symptom severity ratings fit a three-factor solution that explained 55% of the variance. These three factors (symptom clusters) were named sickness symptom cluster, gastrointestinal symptom cluster, and emotional symptom cluster. Patients with pain and with advanced diseases had significantly higher mean scores in the sickness symptom cluster than patients without pain and with earlier-stage diseases. The patients' functional status was negatively correlated with mean scores in the sickness symptom cluster. Patients under chemotherapy demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in the gastrointestinal symptom cluster than patients under other treatments. Patients with anxiety or depression also had significantly higher mean scores in the emotional symptom cluster than patients without anxiety or depression. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified three underlying symptom clusters and verified their conceptual meaning in cancerpatients. Knowing these symptom clusters may help healthcare professionals understand plausible mechanisms for the aggregation of symptoms.
Authors: Charles S Cleeland; Gary J Bennett; Robert Dantzer; Patrick M Dougherty; Adrian J Dunn; Christina A Meyers; Andrew H Miller; Richard Payne; James M Reuben; Xin Shelley Wang; Bang-Ning Lee Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Xiaobo Zhong; Emerson A Lim; Dawn L Hershman; Carol M Moinpour; Joseph Unger; Shing M Lee Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Carolyn Miller Reilly; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Sandra A Mitchell; Lori M Minasian; Ethan Basch; Amylou C Dueck; David Cella; Bryce B Reeve Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-01-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marilyn J Hockenberry; Olga A Taylor; Alice Pasvogel; Cheryl Rodgers; Kathy McCarthy; Patricia Gundy; David W Montgomery; Phillip Ribbeck; Michael E Scheurer; Ida M Ki Moore Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 2.172