Literature DB >> 16491019

Differences in maturation of tick-borne encephalitis virus in mammalian and tick cell line.

Filip Senigl1, Libor Grubhoffer, Jan Kopecky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The maturation process of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in the tick RA-257 and porcine PS cells was studied by transmission electron microscopy and the E and NS1 proteins were localized in the infected cells.
METHODS: The porcine PS and tick RA-257 cell lines were infected with TBEV and examined at different time points post infection under an electron microscope. The E and NS1 proteins were localized with monoclonal antibodies on ultrathin cryosections.
RESULTS: The first virus particles and virus-induced vesicles appeared inside hypertrophied and dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) cisternae in PS cells 15 h p.i. In the course of progressing maturation, the virus particles came up inside the Golgi apparatus and then probably left the cell by the exocytic pathway. Free nucleocapsids did not appear. The observed pattern corresponded to a trans-type maturation. The maximum of the infected PS cell survival was about 50 h p.i. Immunolocalization of some viral proteins (the envelope protein E and the nonstructural protein NS1) revealed the proteins in the cytosol and on the membrane of hypertrophied RER cisternae. On the other hand, the maturation process exhibited different features in the case of the tick RA-257 cells. The nucleocapsids appeared in the cytosol 24 h p.i. and enveloped viral particles were observed in the lumen of vacuoles. Infection of RA-257 cells caused only minor ultrastructural changes and resulted in persistent infection. Immunolocalization of viral proteins in the tick cell line also differed. Proteins E and NS1 were localized in the cytosol and on the vacuolar and plasma membranes.
CONCLUSION: The TBEV maturation pathway in the mammalian host cell line differs from the pathway that the virus undergoes in the tick vector cell line. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491019     DOI: 10.1159/000091471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intervirology        ISSN: 0300-5526            Impact factor:   1.763


  15 in total

Review 1.  Tick cell lines for study of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus and other arboviruses.

Authors:  Lesley Bell-Sakyi; Alain Kohl; Dennis A Bente; John K Fazakerley
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.133

2.  Adenoviral infection in 5 red-tailed hawks and a broad-winged hawk.

Authors:  Emma H Torii; Arno Wünschmann; Anibal G Armién; Sunil K Mor; Emma Chalupsky; Rahul Kumar; Michelle Willette
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.569

3.  ADAM15 Participates in Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Replication.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Rongjuan Pei; Yun Wang; Yuan Zhou; Min Yang; Xinwen Chen; Jizheng Chen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  A Single Amino Acid Substitution in the M Protein Attenuates Japanese Encephalitis Virus in Mammalian Hosts.

Authors:  Mélissanne de Wispelaere; Cécile Khou; Marie-Pascale Frenkiel; Philippe Desprès; Nathalie Pardigon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  How relevant are in vitro culture models for study of tick-pathogen interactions?

Authors:  Cristiano Salata; Sara Moutailler; Houssam Attoui; Erich Zweygarth; Lygia Decker; Lesley Bell-Sakyi
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.735

6.  Coinfection of tick cell lines has variable effects on replication of intracellular bacterial and viral pathogens.

Authors:  Anna Moniuszko; Claudia Rückert; M Pilar Alberdi; Gerald Barry; Brian Stevenson; John K Fazakerley; Alain Kohl; Lesley Bell-Sakyi
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.744

7.  A three-dimensional comparison of tick-borne flavivirus infection in mammalian and tick cell lines.

Authors:  Danielle K Offerdahl; David W Dorward; Bryan T Hansen; Marshall E Bloom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus tick cell lines respond to infection with tick-borne encephalitis virus: transcriptomic and proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Sabine Weisheit; Margarita Villar; Hana Tykalová; Marina Popara; Julia Loecherbach; Mick Watson; Daniel Růžek; Libor Grubhoffer; José de la Fuente; John K Fazakerley; Lesley Bell-Sakyi
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Tick-borne encephalitis virus infects rat astrocytes but does not affect their viability.

Authors:  Maja Potokar; Miša Korva; Jernej Jorgačevski; Tatjana Avšič-Županc; Robert Zorec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Membranous replication factories induced by plus-strand RNA viruses.

Authors:  Inés Romero-Brey; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.