Literature DB >> 16490875

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: an attempt to resolve the diagnostic dilemma.

Karuppiah Saravanan1, Naresh K Panda, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Ashim Das, Rajeev J Bapuraj.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To resolve the diagnostic dilemma of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), an increasingly recognized type of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In spite of extensive studies, controversy exists regarding the etiologic characteristics, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of this entity.
DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study.
SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. PATIENTS: Seventy consecutive patients with CRS, with or without polyps.
METHODS: Patients were evaluated by detailed clinical examination, computed tomography (CT), skin test against aspergillin antigen (47 patients), and histopathologic and mycologic monitoring. Based on the presence or absence of allergic mucin (M) and mycelial element (F) in the sinus, the patients were divided into 4 groups: M+F+ (likely AFRS group), M+F- (likely eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis), M-F+ (likely sinus mycetoma), and M-F- (CRS from other causes). The different parameters were compared in these 4 groups.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were categorized in the likely AFRS group, 12 with eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis, 4 with sinus mycetoma, and 18 with CRS from other causes. Despite considerable overlap among different groups, the following parameters were significantly more associated with AFRS group: type 1 hypersensitivity (P<.05), Charcot-Leyden crystals (P<.001), bony erosion (P<.001), and heterogeneous opacity with sinus expansion on CT scan (P<.05). The above results were further validated in those patients for whom all investigations were conducted (n = 47). The significance of these 4 parameters with regard to AFRS was reconfirmed in those 47 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: To diagnose AFRS, important findings should be considered in addition to the detection of fungal elements and allergic mucin: Charcot-Leyden crystals, type 1 hypersensitivity, bony erosion, and heterogeneous opacity with sinus expansion on CT. The last 3 of these parameters may predict AFRS preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16490875     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.132.2.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  20 in total

1.  Visual loss secondary to eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis in a woman: a case report.

Authors:  Anurag Garg; Raja Das-Bhaumik; Alex D Nesbitt; Adam P Levene; Naresh Joshi; William E Grant; Angus Kennedy
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-10-29

Review 2.  The potential hazards of Aspergillus sp. in foods and feeds, and the role of biological treatment: a review.

Authors:  Sheikh Imranudin Sheikh-Ali; Akil Ahmad; Siti-Hamidah Mohd-Setapar; Zainul Akmal Zakaria; Norfahana Abdul-Talib; Aidee Kamal Khamis; Md Enamul Hoque
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.422

3.  The presence of fungal-specific IgE in serum and sinonasal tissue among patients with sinonasal polyposis.

Authors:  M Bakhshaee; M Fereidouni; M Nourollahian; R Movahed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Fungal colonization in patients with chronic respiratory diseases from Himalayan region of India.

Authors:  Debasis Biswas; Sonal Agarwal; Girish Sindhwani; Jagdish Rawat
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  The prevalence of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis in sinonasal polyposis.

Authors:  Mehdi Bakhshaee; Mohammad Fereidouni; Morteza Nourollahian Mohajer; Mohammad Reza Majidi; Farahzad Jabbari Azad; Toktam Moghiman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Fungal rhinosinusitis: a categorization and definitional schema addressing current controversies.

Authors:  Arunaloke Chakrabarti; David W Denning; Berrylin J Ferguson; Jens Ponikau; Walter Buzina; Hirohito Kita; Bradley Marple; Naresh Panda; Stephan Vlaminck; Catherine Kauffmann-Lacroix; Ashim Das; Paramjeet Singh; Saad J Taj-Aldeen; A Serda Kantarcioglu; Kumud K Handa; Ashok Gupta; M Thungabathra; Mandya R Shivaprakash; Amanjit Bal; Annette Fothergill; Bishan D Radotra
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  [Allergic fungal sinusitis, fungus ball and invasive sinonasal mycosis - three fungal-related diseases].

Authors:  Oliver Driemel; Christina Wagner; Susann Hurrass; Urs Müller-Richter; Thomas Kühnel; Torsten Eugen Reichert; Hartwig Kosmehl
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Epidemiology and differential diagnosis of nasal polyps.

Authors:  Mohamad R Chaaban; Erika M Walsh; Bradford A Woodworth
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.467

9.  Fungal rhinosinusitis: a clinicopathological study from South India.

Authors:  Sundaram Challa; Shantveer G Uppin; Swetha Hanumanthu; Manas K Panigrahi; Anirudh K Purohit; Sitajayalakshmi Sattaluri; Rupam Borgohain; Anjaneyulu Chava; Lakshmi Vemu; Murthy M K Jagarlapudi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Endotyping chronic rhinosinusitis based on olfactory cleft mucus biomarkers.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Rodney J Schlosser; Todd E Bodner; Jeremiah A Alt; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jose L Mattos; Jennifer K Mulligan; Jess C Mace; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.