Literature DB >> 16490739

DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.

Paul R Andreassen1, Gary P H Ho, Alan D D'Andrea.   

Abstract

The cellular response to DNA damage is composed of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms that serve to ensure proper replication of the genome prior to cell division. The function of the DNA damage response during DNA replication in S-phase is critical to this process. Recent evidence has suggested a number of interrelationships of DNA replication and cellular DNA damage responses. These include S-phase checkpoints which suppress replication initiation or elongation in response to DNA damage. Also, many components of the DNA damage response are required either for the stabilization of, or for restarting, stalled replication forks. Further, translesion synthesis permits DNA replication to proceed in the presence of DNA damage and can be coordinated with subsequent repair by homologous recombination (HR). Finally, cohesion of sister chromatids is established coincident with DNA replication and is required for subsequent DNA repair by homologous recombination. Here we review these processes, all of which occur at, or are related to, the advancing replication fork. We speculate that these multiple interdependencies of DNA replication and DNA damage responses integrate the many steps necessary to ensure accurate duplication of the genome.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16490739     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  35 in total

1.  Mrc1 and Tof1 regulate DNA replication forks in different ways during normal S phase.

Authors:  Ben Hodgson; Arturo Calzada; Karim Labib
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Mechanisms of leukemia translocations.

Authors:  Jac A Nickoloff; Leyma P De Haro; Justin Wray; Robert Hromas
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.284

Review 3.  Base excision repair, aging and health span.

Authors:  Guogang Xu; Maryanne Herzig; Vladimir Rotrekl; Christi A Walter
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 5.432

4.  Fanconi anemia proteins and endogenous stresses.

Authors:  Qishen Pang; Paul R Andreassen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  FANCJ/BRIP1 recruitment and regulation of FANCD2 in DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Qiang Fan; Keqin Ren; Arleen D Auerbach; Paul R Andreassen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  Targeting inflammatory pathways for tumor radiosensitization.

Authors:  Amit Deorukhkar; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 7.  Prolonged inflammatory microenvironment is crucial for pro-neoplastic growth and genome instability: a detailed review.

Authors:  Kumari Anuja; Souvick Roy; Chinmoy Ghosh; Priya Gupta; Surajit Bhattacharjee; Birendranath Banerjee
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 8.  Cellular and molecular consequences of defective Fanconi anemia proteins in replication-coupled DNA repair: mechanistic insights.

Authors:  Larry H Thompson; John M Hinz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Inhibitory effect of schisandrin B on gastric cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Xiao-Ni Liu; Cheng-Yu Zhang; Xiu-Dong Jin; Yue-Zhen Li; Xue-Zhi Zheng; Li Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  DNA damage alters DNA polymerase delta to a form that exhibits increased discrimination against modified template bases and mismatched primers.

Authors:  Xiao Meng; Yajing Zhou; Sufang Zhang; Ernest Y C Lee; David N Frick; Marietta Y W T Lee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.