Literature DB >> 16489935

Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial.

E de Miranda1, J G van der Bom, G J Bonsel, O P Bleker, F R Rosendaal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of membrane sweeping at 41 weeks for the prevention of post-term pregnancy.
DESIGN: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Fifty-one primary care midwifery practices in the Netherlands. POPULATION: A total of 742 low-risk pregnant women at 41 weeks of gestation.
METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to serial sweeping of the membranes (every 48 hours until labour commenced up to 42 weeks of gestation) or no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-term pregnancy (>or=42 weeks). Subgroup analyses were performed on nulliparous and parous women. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects.
RESULTS: Serial sweeping of the membranes at 41 weeks decreased the risk of post-term pregnancy (87/375 [23%] versus 149/367 [41%]; relative risk [RR] 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.71; number needed to treat [NNT] 6 [95% CI 4-9]). Benefits were also seen in both subgroups (nulliparous: 57/198 [29%] versus 89/192 [46%]; RR 0.62 [95% CI 0.48-0.81]; NNT 6 [95% CI 4-12] and parous: 30/177 [17%] versus 60/175 [34%]; RR 0.49 [95% CI 0.34-0.73]; NNT 6 [95% CI 4-6]). Adverse effects were similar in both the groups except for uncomplicated bleeding, which was reported more frequently in the sweeping group. Other obstetric outcomes and indicators of neonatal morbidity were similar in both groups. There were two perinatal deaths in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: Membrane sweeping at 41 weeks can substantially reduce the proportion of women with post-term pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489935     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00870.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  8 in total

1.  Membrane Sweeping for Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section and its Outcome -A Comparative Study.

Authors:  V Ramya; Seetesh Ghose; P Pallavee
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 2.  Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.

Authors:  Caroline A Smith; Mike Armour; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-17

Review 3.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  M Boulvain; C Stan; O Irion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

Review 4.  Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellen L Mozurkewich; Julie L Chilimigras; Deborah R Berman; Uma C Perni; Vivian C Romero; Valerie J King; Kristie L Keeton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  Elaine M Finucane; Deirdre J Murphy; Linda M Biesty; Gillian Ml Gyte; Amanda M Cotter; Ethel M Ryan; Michel Boulvain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 6.  Postterm pregnancy.

Authors:  M Galal; I Symonds; H Murray; F Petraglia; R Smith
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

7.  Antepartum Membrane Stripping in GBS Carriers, Is It Safe? (The STRIP-G Study).

Authors:  Doron Kabiri; Yael Hants; Tom Raz Yarkoni; Esther Shaulof; Smadar Eventov Friedman; Ora Paltiel; Ran Nir-Paz; Wesam E Aljamal; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan.

Authors:  Rawan A Obeidat; Mahmoud Almaaitah; Abeer Ben-Sadon; Dina Istaiti; Hasan Rawashdeh; Shereen Hamadneh; Hanan Hammouri; Adel Bataineh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.