Literature DB >> 16489897

Assisted reproductive technology treatment costs of a live birth: an age-stratified cost-outcome study of treatment in Australia.

Georgina M Chambers1, Maria T Ho, Elizabeth A Sullivan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the cost of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment cycles and resultant live-birth events.
DESIGN: Cost-outcome study based on a decision analysis model of significant clinical and economic outcomes of ART. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All non-donor ART treatments initiated in Australia in 2002. Treatment cycles, maternal age and birth outcome data were obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database. Direct health care costs were obtained from fertility centres, and included government, private insurer and patient costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average health care cost of non-donor, fresh and frozen embryo ART treatment cycles. Average and age-specific costs per live-birth event following ART treatment.
RESULTS: Average health care cost per non-donor ART live-birth event was 32,903 US dollars (range, 24,809 US dollars for women < 30 years to 97,884 US dollars for women > or = 40 years). The cost per live birth for women aged > or = 42 years was 182,794 US dollars. The average treatment cost of a fresh cycle was 6,940 US dollars, compared with 1,937 US dollars for a frozen embryo transfer cycle.
CONCLUSIONS: Debate regarding funding for ART services has been hindered by a lack of economic studies of ART treatments and outcomes in Australia. This is the most comprehensive costing study of ART services to date in terms of resources consumed during ART treatment. It confirms that ART treatment is less cost-effective in older women. Alongside economic considerations of ART, community values, ethical judgements and clinical factors should influence policy decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  Should there be a female age limit on public funding for assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Drew Carter; Amber M Watt; Annette Braunack-Mayer; Adam G Elshaug; John R Moss; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  IVF cycle cost estimation using Activity Based Costing and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Lucia Cassettari; Marco Mosca; Roberto Mosca; Fabio Rolando; Mauro Costa; Valerio Pisaturo
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-04-22

3.  Declining rates of sterilisation reversal procedures in western Australian women from 1990 to 2008: the relationship with age, hospital type and government policy changes.

Authors:  Khadra A Jama-Alol; Alexandra P Bremner; Gavin Pereira; Louise M Stewart; Eva Malacova; Rachael Moorin; David B Preen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Night Shift Among Women: Is It Associated With Difficulty Conceiving a First Birth?

Authors:  Renae C Fernandez; Vivienne M Moore; Jennifer L Marino; Melissa J Whitrow; Michael J Davies
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-12-01

5.  Australian women's use of complementary and alternative medicines to enhance fertility: exploring the experiences of women and practitioners.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Rayner; Helen L McLachlan; Della A Forster; Rhian Cramer
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  Building resilience: a preliminary exploration of women's perceptions of the use of acupuncture as an adjunct to In Vitro Fertilisation.

Authors:  Sheryl de Lacey; Caroline A Smith; Charlotte Paterson
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.659

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.