Literature DB >> 16489853

Therapeutic itineraries in rural and urban areas: a Portuguese study.

Berta Nunes1, Maria João Sena Esteves.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: When people become ill they use strategies to solve their problem that include existing therapeutic resources in the community. Their choices are guided by the beliefs of local communities regarding the body, health and illness, and the therapeutic resources available. This study compares the uses of alternative and traditional treatments in a rural area and an urban area of the north of Portugal, investigating the differences and similarities in the behaviour of people when they become ill.
METHODS: This descriptive study provides interviews with two groups of adults, in a rural area (Alfandega da Fe and Miranda do Douro) and in an urban area (city of Porto), Portugal), with the aim of understanding the knowledge and uses of alternative and traditional therapists and treatments.
RESULTS: Approximately half of those in the urban area and almost all of those in the rural area knew of alternative therapists and treatments, the most known being bonesetters, acupuncturists and herbanarias (shops where people sell medicinal plants for teas) in the urban areas; and bonesetters, sorcerers (bruxos) and local healers (curandeiros) in rural areas. In relation to the use of these therapists and treatments, approximately 25% in the urban area and 75% in the rural area reported that they used such treatments. Bonesetters were the most used in both areas, followed by sorcerers and teas in the rural areas, and acupuncturists and teas in the urban areas. When asked about the reasons for using these therapists and treatments, the majority reported pain in the bones, muscle and joints, followed by psychological complaints in urban areas; and traditional diagnostics in rural areas for leaned souls (almas encostadas), fears or anxieties and visions etc. Most of the people who had used these treatments had not spoken to their family doctor about them because they believed 'doctors do not accept these medicines'. Approximately 80% in the two studied groups said they have been totally or partially satisfied with the treatments and the main reason was their effectiveness. The majority did not consider these treatments expensive.
CONCLUSIONS: We found differences in the use of the alternative and traditional diagnostics and therapeutic resources in the urban and rural areas studied. However, we also found similarities between the two areas, such as the use of bonesetters to deal with problem of muscular and joint pains, and the use of teas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rural Remote Health        ISSN: 1445-6354            Impact factor:   1.759


  4 in total

1.  Traditional versus orthodox fracture care in uyo, Nigeria.

Authors:  Te Nottidge; Ei Akpanudo; O Akinbami
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2011-01

2.  A qualitative study of naturopathy in rural practice: a focus upon naturopaths' experiences and perceptions of rural patients and demands for their services.

Authors:  Jon L Wardle; Jon Adams; Chi-Wai Lui
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A comparison of complementary and alternative medicine users and use across geographical areas: a national survey of 1,427 women.

Authors:  Jon Adams; David Sibbritt; Alex Broom; Deborah Loxton; Marie Pirotta; John Humphreys; Chi-Wai Lui
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.659

4.  Blessing as a health resource: cross-sectional study with elderly residents of rural areas.

Authors:  Stephanie Jesien; Luana Patrícia Marmitt; Rodrigo Dalke Meucci
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.772

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.