AIM: To evaluate self-assessed level of clinical skills of graduating medical students at Zagreb University School of Medicine and compare them with clinical skill levels expected by their teachers and those defined by a criterion standard. METHOD: The study included all medical students (n=252) graduating from the Zagreb University School of Medicine in the 2004-2005 academic year and faculty members (n=129) involved in teaching clinical skills. The participants completed anonymous questionnaire listing 99 clinical skills divided into nine groups. Students were asked to assess their clinical skills on a 0-5 scale, and faculty members were asked to assess the minimum necessary level of clinical skills expected from graduating medical students, using the same 0-5 scale. We compared the assessment scores of faculty members with students' self-assessment scores. Participants were grouped according to their descriptive characteristics for further comparison. RESULTS: The response rate was 91% for students and 70% for faculty members. Students' self-assessment scores in all nine groups of clinical skills ranged from 2.2-/+0.8 to 3.8-/+0.5 and were lower than those defined by the criterion standard (3.0-4.0) and those expected by teachers (from 3.1-/+1.0 to 4.4-/+0.5) (P<0.001 for all). Students who had additional clinical skills training had higher scores in all groups of skills, ranging from 2.6-/+0.9 to 4.0-/+0.5 (P<0.001 for all). Male students had higher scores than female students in emergency (P<0.001), neurology (P=0.017), ear, nose, and throat (P=0.002), urology (P=0.003), and surgery skills (P=0.002). Teachers' expectations did not vary according to their sex, academic position, or specialty. CONCLUSION: Students' self-assessed level of clinical skills was lower than that expected by their teachers. Education during clinical rotations is not focused on acquiring clinical skills, and additional clinical skills' training has a positive influence on students' self-assessed level of clinical skills. There was no consensus among teachers on the required level of students' clinical skills.
AIM: To evaluate self-assessed level of clinical skills of graduating medical students at Zagreb University School of Medicine and compare them with clinical skill levels expected by their teachers and those defined by a criterion standard. METHOD: The study included all medical students (n=252) graduating from the Zagreb University School of Medicine in the 2004-2005 academic year and faculty members (n=129) involved in teaching clinical skills. The participants completed anonymous questionnaire listing 99 clinical skills divided into nine groups. Students were asked to assess their clinical skills on a 0-5 scale, and faculty members were asked to assess the minimum necessary level of clinical skills expected from graduating medical students, using the same 0-5 scale. We compared the assessment scores of faculty members with students' self-assessment scores. Participants were grouped according to their descriptive characteristics for further comparison. RESULTS: The response rate was 91% for students and 70% for faculty members. Students' self-assessment scores in all nine groups of clinical skills ranged from 2.2-/+0.8 to 3.8-/+0.5 and were lower than those defined by the criterion standard (3.0-4.0) and those expected by teachers (from 3.1-/+1.0 to 4.4-/+0.5) (P<0.001 for all). Students who had additional clinical skills training had higher scores in all groups of skills, ranging from 2.6-/+0.9 to 4.0-/+0.5 (P<0.001 for all). Male students had higher scores than female students in emergency (P<0.001), neurology (P=0.017), ear, nose, and throat (P=0.002), urology (P=0.003), and surgery skills (P=0.002). Teachers' expectations did not vary according to their sex, academic position, or specialty. CONCLUSION: Students' self-assessed level of clinical skills was lower than that expected by their teachers. Education during clinical rotations is not focused on acquiring clinical skills, and additional clinical skills' training has a positive influence on students' self-assessed level of clinical skills. There was no consensus among teachers on the required level of students' clinical skills.
Authors: R Remmen; A Scherpbier; C van der Vleuten; J Denekens; A Derese; I Hermann; R Hoogenboom; A Kramer; H Van Rossum; P Van Royen; L Bossaert Journal: Med Educ Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Charlotte Ringsted; Torben V. Schroeder; Jørgen Henriksen; Benedicte Ramsing; Peter Lyngdorf; Viggo Jønsson; Albert Scherpbier Journal: Med Teach Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Sebastian H Hoefer; Jasmina Sterz; Bernd Bender; Maria-Christina Stefanescu; Marius Theis; Felix Walcher; Robert Sader; Miriam Ruesseler Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Galo Sánchez Del Hierro; Roy Remmen; Veronique Verhoeven; Paul Van Royen; Kristin Hendrickx Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 2.692