Literature DB >> 16489562

Guidewire navigation in coronary artery stenoses using a novel magnetic navigation system: first clinical experience.

Keiichi Tsuchida1, Héctor M García-García, Willem J van der Giessen, Eugène P McFadden, Martin van der Ent, Georgios Sianos, Hans Meulenbrug, Andrew T L Ong, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of guidewire navigation across coronary artery stenoses using magnetic navigation system (MNS) versus conventional navigation. The MNS is a novel option to facilitate access to target lesions, particularly in tortuous vessels. In an experimental study using a challenging vessel phantom, magnetic-navigated guidewire passage has been reported to reduce fluoroscopy and procedure time significantly. Both magnetic and manual guidewire navigation were attempted in 21 consecutive diseased coronary arteries. The study endpoint was defined as an intraluminal wire position distal to the stenosis. Procedural success was defined as successful guidewire passage without procedural events. Procedure time, amount of contrast, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose/area product (DAP) were evaluated. There were no procedural events related to either guidewire. Although the lesions attempted had relatively simple and straightforward characteristics, significantly shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time were observed for manual guidewire navigation compared to MNS (median, 40 vs. 120 sec, P=0.001; 38 vs. 105 sec, P=0.001, respectively). Contrast amount and DAP were higher in MNS than in conventional method (median, 13 vs. 9 ml, P=0.018; 215 vs. 73 Gym2, P=0.002, respectively). The magnetic wire did not cross in two vessels. Guidewire navigation using MNS presented a novel, safe, and feasible approach to address coronary artery lesions. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of the MNS in more complex coronary lesions and tortuous anatomy. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489562     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic wire navigation with the conventional wire technique for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Christian Roth; Rudolf Berger; Sabine Scherzer; Lisa Krenn; Clemens Gangl; Daniel Dalos; Georg Delle-Karth; Thomas Neunteufl
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  German stereotaxis-guided percutaneous coronary intervention study group: first multicenter real world experience.

Authors:  Korff Krause; Umar Adamu; Michael Weber; Klaus Hertting; Christian Hamm; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Rainer Hoffmann; Malte Kelm; Rüdiger Blindt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation.

Authors:  Yoonho Kim; Emily Genevriere; Pablo Harker; Jaehun Choe; Marcin Balicki; Robert W Regenhardt; Justin E Vranic; Adam A Dmytriw; Aman B Patel; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 4.  [Magnetic navigation in invasive electrophysiological diagnostic and therapy].

Authors:  R Schimpf; T Reents; G Hessling; I Deisenhofer; A Pflaumer; H Estner; J Wu; E Ucer; B Zrenner; T Sueselbeck; J Kuschyk; C Veltmann; M Borggrefe; C Wolpert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-09

Review 5.  Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots.

Authors:  Yoonho Kim; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 72.087

6.  Magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyong Qi; Bangwei Wu; Xinping Luo; Jun Zhu; Haiming Shi; Bo Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.