| Literature DB >> 16489261 |
Ergul Belge Kurutas1, Ali Cetinkaya, Ertan Bulbuloglu, Bulent Kantarceken.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and L-carnitine (LCAR) supplementations on polymorphonuclear leukocytes myeloperoxidase (MPO) and Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD) and plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) in acetic acid (AA)-induced ulcerative colitis model. The mean polymorphonuclear leukocyte MPO and Cu/Zn-SOD activity was significantly higher in the colitis group than in the control group. Both NAC and LCAR pretreatment markedly decreased MPO and Cu/Zn-SOD activity compared to colitis group. AA administration significantly increased the levels of plasma MDA in comparison with controls. However, NAC and LCAR administration to the AA-treated rats significantly reduced the MDA levels compared to colitis group. In conclusion NAC and LCAR could be beneficial agents in restoring the circulating proinflammatory mediators.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16489261 PMCID: PMC1533903 DOI: 10.1155/MI.2005.390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
The effects of NAC and LCAR on PMN leukocyte MPO and Cu/Zn-SOD activity. Note: data are presented as mean ± SD; PMN, polymorphonuclear; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NAC, N-acetylcysteine; and LCAR, L-carnitine.
| PMN leukocyte MPO | PMN leukocyte Cu/Zn-SOD | |
| activity (IU/mg protein) | activity (IU/mg protein) | |
| Control group ( | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.02 |
| Colitis group ( | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.04 |
| NAC pretreatment group ( | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
| LCAR pretreatment group ( | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.03 |
∗P < .05, significantly different from treatment groups.
∗∗P < .001, significantly different from control and treatment groups.
Figure 1Plasma MDA (malondialdehyde) levels in AA-induced colitis in rats. Data are mean ± SD of 10 rats per group. #, colitis group was significantly different from other groups (P < .001); ∗, control group was significantly different from pretreatment groups (P < .001).