Literature DB >> 16489127

A single point mutation (N514Y) in the human M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor reveals differences in the properties of antagonists: evidence for differential inverse agonism.

Mark R Dowling1, Jonathon M Willets, David C Budd, Steven J Charlton, Stefan R Nahorski, R A John Challiss.   

Abstract

A single asparagine-to-tyrosine point mutation in the human M muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor at residue 514 (N514Y) resulted in a marked increase (approximately 300%) in agonist-independent [3H]inositol phosphate ([3H]IPx) accumulation compared with the response observed for the wild-type (WT) receptor. All the antagonists tested were able to inhibit both the WT-M3 and (N514Y)M3 mACh receptor-mediated basal [3H]IPx accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner. However, significant differences in both potency and binding affinity were only seen for those antagonists that possess greater receptor affinity. Despite being transfected with equivalent amounts of cDNA, cells expressed the (N514Y)M3 mACh receptor at levels that were only 25 to 30% of those seen for the WT receptor. Differences in the ability of chronic antagonist exposure to up-regulate (N514Y)M3 mACh receptor expression levels were also seen, with 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine (4-DAMP) producing only 50% of the receptor up-regulation produced by atropine or pirenzepine. Basal phosphorylation of the (N514Y)M3 mACh receptor was approximately 100% greater than that seen for the WT-M3 receptor. The ability of antagonists to decrease basal (N514Y)M3 mACh receptor phosphorylation revealed differences in inverse-agonist efficacy. Atropine, 4-DAMP, and pirenzepine all reduced basal phosphorylation to similar levels, whereas methoctramine, a full inverse agonist with respect to reducing agonist-independent [3H]IPx accumulation, produced no significant attenuation of basal receptor phosphorylation. This study shows that mACh receptor inverse agonists can exhibit differential signaling profiles, which are dependent on the specific pathway investigated, and therefore provides evidence that the molecular mechanism of inverse agonism is likely to be more complex than the stabilization of a single inactive receptor conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489127     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.101246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  5 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of allosteric and orthosteric agonists on m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor internalization and down-regulation.

Authors:  Rachel L Thomas; Christopher J Langmead; Martyn D Wood; R A John Challiss
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  A conserved motif in the membrane proximal C-terminal tail of human muscarinic m1 acetylcholine receptors affects plasma membrane expression.

Authors:  Gregory W Sawyer; Frederick J Ehlert; Crystal A Shults
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  FRET-based detection of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation by orthosteric and allosteric agonists.

Authors:  Danijela Markovic; Jonathan Holdich; Suleiman Al-Sabah; Rajendra Mistry; Cornelius Krasel; Martyn P Mahaut-Smith; R A John Challiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  M2 Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor modulates rat airway smooth muscle cell proliferation.

Authors:  Fabiola A Placeres-Uray; Christopher A Febres-Aldana; Ruth Fernandez-Ruiz; Ramona Gonzalez de Alfonzo; Itala A Lippo de Becemberg; Marcelo J Alfonzo
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.084

5.  Analyses of the effects of Gq protein on the activated states of the muscarinic M3 receptor and the purinergic P2Y1 receptor.

Authors:  Michihiro Tateyama; Yoshihiro Kubo
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-10-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.