Literature DB >> 16489077

A study of the biological receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand inhibitor, denosumab, in patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases from breast cancer.

Jean-Jacques Body1, Thierry Facon, Robert E Coleman, Allan Lipton, Filip Geurs, Michelle Fan, Donna Holloway, Mark C Peterson, Pirow J Bekker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) is essential for the differentiation, function, and survival of osteoclasts, which play a key role in establishment and propagation of skeletal disease in patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases as well as many other skeletal diseases. Denosumab (AMG 162), a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, was developed to treat patients with skeletal diseases. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter study to determine the safety and efficacy of denosumab in patients with breast cancer (n = 29) or multiple myeloma (n = 25) with radiologically confirmed bone lesions. Patients received a single dose of either denosumab (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg s.c.) or pamidronate (90 mg i.v.). Bone antiresorptive effect was assessed by changes in urinary and serum N-telopeptide levels. Pharmacokinetics of denosumab also were assessed.
RESULTS: Following a single s.c. dose of denosumab, levels of urinary and serum N-telopeptide decreased within 1 day, and this decrease lasted through 84 days at the higher denosumab doses. Pamidronate also decreased bone turnover, but the effect diminished progressively through follow-up. Denosumab injections were well tolerated. Mean half-lives of denosumab were 33.3 and 46.3 days for the two highest dosages.
CONCLUSIONS: A single s.c. dose of denosumab given to patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases from breast cancer was well tolerated and reduced bone resorption for at least 84 days. The decrease in bone turnover markers was similar in magnitude but more sustained than with i.v. pamidronate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489077     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  117 in total

Review 1.  Bone cancer pain.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Jimenez-Andrade; William G Mantyh; Aaron P Bloom; Alice S Ferng; Christopher P Geffre; Patrick W Mantyh
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Myeloma as a model for the process of metastasis: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Significant addition to treatment options for bone metastasis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Emily D Richardson; Douglas K Price; William D Figg
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Application of quantitative pharmacology in development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Mohammad Tabrizi; Cherryl Funelas; Hamza Suria
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Butein, a tetrahydroxychalcone, suppresses cancer-induced osteoclastogenesis through inhibition of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand signaling.

Authors:  Bokyung Sung; Sung-Gook Cho; Mingyao Liu; Bharat B Aggarwal
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Thiocolchicoside suppresses osteoclastogenesis induced by RANKL and cancer cells through inhibition of inflammatory pathways: a new use for an old drug.

Authors:  Simone Reuter; Subash C Gupta; Kanokkarn Phromnoi; Bharat B Aggarwal
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases in breast cancer: evidence and opinion.

Authors:  Guenther G Steger; Rupert Bartsch
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 8.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Myeloma and Bone Disease.

Authors:  Cristina Panaroni; Andrew J Yee; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Bone health and prostate cancer.

Authors:  P J Saylor; M R Smith
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.