Literature DB >> 16488406

Development of a view-invariant representation of the human head.

Teodora Gliga1, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz.   

Abstract

Do infants perceive visual cues as diverse as frontal-view faces, profiles or bodies as being different aspects of the same object, a fellow human? If that is the case, visual exposure to one such cue should facilitate the subsequent processing of the others. To verify this hypothesis, we recorded event-related responses in 4-month-old infants and in adults. Pictures of eyes were interleaved amongst images belonging to three human contexts (frontal-view faces, profiles or bodies) or non-human contexts (houses, cars or pliers). In adults, both profile and frontal-face contexts elicited suppression of the N170 response to eye pictures, indicating an access to a view-invariant representation of faces. In infants, a response suppression of the N290 component was recorded only in the context of frontal faces, while profile context induces a different effect (i.e., a P400 enhancement) on eye processing. This dissociation suggests that the view-invariant representation of faces is learned, as it is for other 3-D objects and needs more than 4 months of exposure to be established. In a follow-up study, where infants were exposed to a short movie showing people rotating their heads, the profile-induced P400 effect was speeded up, indicating that exposure to successive views of the same object is probably a way to build up adult-like face representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488406     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

Review 1.  The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Stefanie Peykarjou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 2.  Is human face recognition lateralized to the right hemisphere due to neural competition with left-lateralized visual word recognition? A critical review.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Aliette Lochy
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Do infants represent the face in a viewpoint-invariant manner? Neural adaptation study as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Megumi Kobayashi; Yumiko Otsuka; Emi Nakato; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Rapid categorization of natural face images in the infant right hemisphere.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Babies get it right.

Authors:  Hillary Hadley; Lisa Scott
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Visual object categorization in infancy.

Authors:  Céline Spriet; Etienne Abassi; Jean-Rémy Hochmann; Liuba Papeo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Maturational trajectory of fusiform gyrus neural activity when viewing faces: From 4 months to 4 years old.

Authors:  Yuhan Chen; Olivia Allison; Heather L Green; Emily S Kuschner; Song Liu; Mina Kim; Michelle Slinger; Kylie Mol; Taylor Chiang; Luke Bloy; Timothy P L Roberts; J Christopher Edgar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Babies and brains: habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Brian J Scholl; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Distinct cerebral pathways for object identity and number in human infants.

Authors:  Véronique Izard; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  How Infants' Arousal Influences Their Visual Search.

Authors:  Johan Lundin Kleberg; Teresa Del Bianco; Terje Falck-Ytter
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2018-12-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.