Literature DB >> 16488235

Using support vector machines to optimally classify rotator cuff strength data and quantify post-operative strength in rotator cuff tear patients.

Aaron E Silver1, Matthew P Lungren, Marjorie E Johnson, Shawn W O'Driscoll, Kai-Nan An, Richard E Hughes.   

Abstract

Shoulder strength data are important for post-operative assessment of shoulder function and have been used in diagnosis of rotator cuff pathology. Support vector machines (SVM) employ complex analysis techniques to solve classification and regression problems. A SVM, a machine learning technique, can be used for analysis and classification of shoulder strength data. The goals of this study were to determine the diagnostic competency of SVM based on shoulder strength data and to apply SVM analysis in efforts to derive a single representative shoulder strength score. Data were taken from fourteen isometric shoulder strength measurements of each shoulder (involved and uninvolved) in 45 rotator cuff tear patients. SVM diagnostic proficiency was found to be comparable to reported ultrasound values. Improvement of shoulder function was accurately represented by a single score in pairwise comparison of the pre-operative and the 12 month post-operative group (P < 0.004). Thus, the SVM-based score may be a promising metric for summarizing rotator cuff strength data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488235     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  An integer programming model for optimizing shoulder rehabilitation.

Authors:  Christopher J Gatti; Jason Scibek; Oleg Svintsitski; James E Carpenter; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Analyzing glenohumeral torque-rotation response in vivo.

Authors:  Christina L Beardsley; Alan B Howard; Scott M Wisotsky; Adam B Shafritz; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Vikas Kumar; Christopher Roche; Steven Overman; Ryan Simovitch; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas Wright; Joseph Zuckerman; Howard Routman; Ankur Teredesai
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Federico Cabitza; Angela Locoro; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.