Literature DB >> 16488055

Gefitinib in patients with chemo-sensitive and chemo-refractory relapsed small cell cancers: a Hoosier Oncology Group phase II trial.

A M Moore1, L H Einhorn, D Estes, R Govindan, J Axelson, J Vinson, T E Breen, M Yu, N H Hanna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib has demonstrated activity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials have not demonstrated a relationship between response to gefitinib and over-expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Although, EGFR is not over-expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), we postulated that gefitinib might affect tumor growth through other mechanisms. Agents that are active in NSCLC usually are also effective in SCLC.
METHODS: The primary objective was to assess the clinical control rate: complete response (CR) partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD > 90 days), of gefitinib in patients with chemo-resistant and chemo-sensitive small cell cancers. Eligibility criteria included pathologic proof of a neuroendocrine tumor, especially small cell cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-2, prior treatment with one or two prior chemotherapy regimens and adequate end-organ function. Patients received gefitinib, 250 mg p.o. daily until disease progression or intolerable side effects.
RESULTS: From April 2003 to March 2004, 19 patients were enrolled. Small cell lung cancer accounted for 18 of the 19 patients and one patient had metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Twelve patients (63%) had chemo-sensitive disease, defined as progression greater than three months from completion of prior chemotherapy; 7 (37%) had chemo-refractory disease; 13 (68%) had one prior chemotherapy regimen. Other patient characteristics: mean age 64 years (range 52-79 years); ECOG PS 0/1/2 = 7/9/3, M:F = 9:10. Grade 3 toxicities included: fatigue in three patients (15.8%), pulmonary toxicities in three (15.8%) and one patient (5.3%) each with hyperglycemia or pain. Four patients had grade four toxicities: one patient (5.3%) with fatigue and three patients (15.8%) with dyspnea. There were no patients with grade 3 or 4 rash or diarrhea. Two patients had stable disease (<90 days) and 17 had progressive disease as their best response. This study was a two-stage design and because the continuing criterion for stage one was not met, stage 2 was not performed. Median time to progression (TTP) was 50 days (95% CI = 21-58 days). One year overall survival (OS) was 21% (95% CI = 6-45.6%).
CONCLUSION: Although gefitinib has activity in select patients with NSCLC, this study failed to demonstrate benefit in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488055     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  30 in total

Review 1.  Small cell lung cancer: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Estelamari Rodriguez; Rogerio C Lilenbaum
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  The development of targeted therapy in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yalei Zhang; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A phase II trial of the Src-kinase inhibitor saracatinib after four cycles of chemotherapy for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: NCCTG trial N-0621.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; Nathan R Foster; Thanyanan Reungwetwattana; Garth D Nelson; Andrew V Grainger; Preston D Steen; Philip J Stella; Randolph Marks; John Wright; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 4.  Transformation from non-small-cell lung cancer to small-cell lung cancer: molecular drivers and cells of origin.

Authors:  Matthew G Oser; Matthew J Niederst; Lecia V Sequist; Jeffrey A Engelman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 5.  Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options.

Authors:  Hassan Lemjabbar-Alaoui; Omer Ui Hassan; Yi-Wei Yang; Petra Buchanan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-08-19

6.  Expression and mutation of the c-kit gene and correlation with prognosis of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Yang Lu; Gu Zhang; Qiao-Yuan Cheng; Bo Chen; Ju-Fen Cai; Xiao-Jia Wang; Yi-Ping Zhang; Zeng Wang; Zhen-Yi Lu; Fa-Jun Xie; Wei-Min Mao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Targeted therapies in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Yang Lu; Xiao-Jia Wang; Wei-Min Mao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Small cell lung cancer (SCLC): no treatment advances in recent years.

Authors:  Filippos Koinis; Athanasios Kotsakis; Vasileios Georgoulias
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02

Review 9.  Is the Canonical RAF/MEK/ERK Signaling Pathway a Therapeutic Target in SCLC?

Authors:  Sandra Cristea; Julien Sage
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 10.  Treatment options for small cell lung cancer - do we have more choice?

Authors:  M Puglisi; S Dolly; A Faria; J S Myerson; S Popat; M E R O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.