Literature DB >> 16487845

Risk stratification with electrocardiographic-gated dobutamine stress technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission tomographic imaging: value of heart rate response and assessment of left ventricular function.

Sachin M Navare1, Deborah Katten, Lynne L Johnson, Jeffery F Mather, Michael S Fowler, Alan W Ahlberg, Nicholas Miele, Gary V Heller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the significance of heart rate response to dobutamine and the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function during risk stratification of patients undergoing dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (DSMPI).
BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging has been shown to effectively risk stratify highly selected patients. However, based on perfusion alone, patients with normal and abnormal tests have twice the risk as comparable patients with exercise testing. The added value of assessment of LV function and the heart rate response to dobutamine in risk stratification of these patients is unknown.
METHODS: Follow-up information (cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction) was obtained on 1,367 consecutive patients who underwent DSMPI due to inability to perform adequate exercise and contraindications to vasodilators. Perfusion images were interpreted using a 17-segment model. Abnormal perfusion and function were defined as: summed stress score > or =4 and ejection fraction <50%, respectively.
RESULTS: Annualized event rates (AERs) were related to the extent/severity of perfusion defects and worsening LV function. A three-risk category model was constructed from combined assessment of perfusion and function, with AERs of 2.4% (both normal), 5.8% (discordant), and 11.3% (both abnormal); p < 0.001. Stress electrocardiogram (ECG) data added incremental value to myocardial perfusion alone but not to combined assessment of perfusion and function. Importantly, inability to achieve 85% of mean predicted heart rate was associated with worse outcomes and was an independent predictor of cardiac events. For patients in whom perfusion, function, and stress ECG response were normal, inability to achieve target heart rate was associated with significantly higher AER (1.5% vs. 3.4%, respectively, p = 0.021).
CONCLUSIONS: In highly selected patients undergoing DSMPI, assessment of perfusion and function is effective in risk stratification. The stress ECG and heart rate response to dobutamine have prognostic value and should be incorporated into image interpretation so as to maximize risk stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16487845     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

1.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Patient preparation for nuclear imaging: when should anti-ischemic medications be withheld?

Authors:  Sarkis B Baghdasarian; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Symptom-limited exercise combined with dipyridamole stress: prognostic value in assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease by use of gated SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Alan W Ahlberg; Sarkis B Baghdasarian; Haris Athar; Jeffrey P Thompsen; Deborah M Katten; Gavin L Noble; Igor Mamkin; Anuj R Shah; Ivette A Leka; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Single injection, double acquisition: a double-edged sword?

Authors:  Ernst E van der Wall; Yves G America; Arthur J Scholte; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  (31)P cardiac magnetic resonance spectroscopy during leg exercise at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Lucy E Hudsmith; Damian J Tyler; Yaso Emmanuel; Steffen E Petersen; Jane M Francis; Hugh Watkins; Kieran Clarke; Matthew D Robson; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Nuclear cardiology in the literature.

Authors:  Kenneth A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Renato Cuocolo; Stefania Daniele; Valeria Cantoni; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Risk stratification with attenuation corrected stress Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in the absence of ECG-gating due to arrhythmias.

Authors:  Sarkis B Baghdasarian; Gavin L Noble; Alan W Ahlberg; Deborah Katten; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Prediction of long-term (> 10 year) cardiovascular outcomes in heart transplant recipients: Value of stress technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jesse F Veenis; Hendrik J Boiten; Jan C van den Berge; Kadir Caliskan; Alex P W M Maat; Roelf Valkema; Alina A Constantinescu; Olivier C Manintveld; Felix Zijlstra; Ron T van Domburg; Arend F L Schinkel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  A model for the prediction of a successful stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; Usman Baber; Elliot J Levine; Lori B Croft; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.