Literature DB >> 16487566

Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment.

Gerald J Zagury1, Viktors I Kulnieks, Carmen M Neculita.   

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD), which contains high concentrations of sulphate and dissolved metals, is a serious environmental problem. It can be treated in situ by sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB), but effectiveness of the treatment process depends on the organic substrate chosen to supply the bacteria's carbon source. Six natural organic materials were characterized in order to investigate how well these promote sulphate reduction and metal precipitation by SRB. Maple wood chips, sphagnum peat moss, leaf compost, conifer compost, poultry manure and conifer sawdust were investigated in terms of their carbon (TOC, TIC, DOC) and nitrogen (TKN) content, as well as their easily available substances content (EAS). Single substrates, ethanol, a mixture of leaf compost (30% w/w), poultry manure (18% w/w), and maple wood chips (2% w/w), and the same mixture spiked with formaldehyde were then tested in a 70-day batch experiment to evaluate their performance in sulphate reduction and metal removal from synthetic AMD. Metal removal efficiency in batch reactors was as high as 100% for Fe, 99% for Mn, 99% for Cd, 99% for Ni, and 94% for Zn depending on reactive mixtures. Early metal removal (0-12d) was attributed to the precipitation of (oxy)hydroxides and carbonate minerals. The lowest metal and sulphate removal efficiency was found in the reactor containing poultry manure as the single carbon source despite its high DOC and EAS content. The mixture of organic materials was most effective in promoting sulphate reduction, followed by ethanol and maple wood chips, and single natural organic substrates generally showed low reactivity. Formaldehyde (0.015% (w/v)) provided only temporary bacterial inhibition. Although characterization of substrates on an individual basis provided insight on their chemical make-up, it did not give a clear indication of their ability to promote sulphate reduction and metal removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16487566     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  12 in total

1.  Longevity of organic layers of vertical flow ponds for sulfate reduction in treating mine drainages in South Korea.

Authors:  Young-Wook Cheong; Won Hur; Gil-Jae Yim; Sang-Woo Ji; Jae-E Yang; Hwan-Jo Baek; Yon-Sik Shim
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Mechanisms and effectivity of sulfate reducing bioreactors using a chitinous substrate in treating mining influenced water.

Authors:  Souhail R Al-Abed; Patricio X Pinto; John McKernan; Elisabeth Feld-Cook; Slawomir M Lomnicki
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 13.273

3.  Comparison of the efficiency of chitinous and ligneous substrates in metal and sulfate removal from mining-influenced water.

Authors:  Patricio X Pinto; Souhail R Al-Abed; John McKernan
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Determination of point of zero charge of natural organic materials.

Authors:  Elisee Nsimba Bakatula; Dominique Richard; Carmen Mihaela Neculita; Gerald J Zagury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Performance assessment of laboratory and field-scale multi-step passive treatment of iron-rich acid mine drainage for design improvement.

Authors:  Tsiverihasina V Rakotonimaro; Carmen Mihaela Neculita; Bruno Bussière; Thomas Genty; Gérald J Zagury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Up-flow anaerobic column reactor for sulfate-rich cadmium-bearing wastewater purification: system performance, removal mechanism and microbial community structure.

Authors:  Yongrong Jiang; Jie Zhang; Qianmin Wen; Junjian Zheng; Yuanyuan Zhang; Qiaoyan Wei; Yongli Qin; Xuehong Zhang
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Algae as an electron donor promoting sulfate reduction for the bioremediation of acid rock drainage.

Authors:  Pedro Ayala-Parra; Reyes Sierra-Alvarez; Jim A Field
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  The microbial community of a passive biochemical reactor treating arsenic, zinc, and sulfate-rich seepage.

Authors:  Susan Anne Baldwin; Maryam Khoshnoodi; Maryam Rezadehbashi; Marcus Taupp; Steven Hallam; Al Mattes; Hamed Sanei
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-06

9.  Hydraulic retention time and pH affect the performance and microbial communities of passive bioreactors for treatment of acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Tomo Aoyagi; Takaya Hamai; Tomoyuki Hori; Yuki Sato; Mikio Kobayashi; Yuya Sato; Tomohiro Inaba; Atsushi Ogata; Hiroshi Habe; Takeshi Sakata
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Spent MgO-carbon refractory bricks as a material for permeable reactive barriers to treat a nickel- and cobalt-contaminated groundwater.

Authors:  Carl de Repentigny; Benoît Courcelles; Gérald J Zagury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.