Literature DB >> 16487232

Orphan drug development is progressing too slowly.

Roberta Joppi1, Vittorio Bertele, Silvio Garattini.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the methodological quality of OMP dossiers and to discuss possible reasons for the small number of products licensed.
METHODS: Information about orphan drug designation and approval was obtained from the website of the European Commission-Enterprise and Industry DG and from the European Public Assessment Reports.
RESULTS: Out of 255 OMP designations, only 18 were approved (7.1%). Their dossiers often showed methodological limitations such as inappropriate clinical design, lack of active comparator where available and use of surrogate end-points.
CONCLUSIONS: The paucity of European incentives for manufacturers and the poor documentation underpinning the applications may have limited the number of new OMP. The over 5000 rare diseases awaiting therapy are an important public health issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16487232      PMCID: PMC1885013          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02579.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  21 in total

1.  Policy alternatives for treatments for rare diseases.

Authors:  Abbas H Panju; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Availability of and access to orphan drugs: an international comparison of pharmaceutical treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, hereditary angioedema and chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Carl Rudolf Blankart; Tom Stargardt; Jonas Schreyögg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Are rare diseases still orphans or happily adopted? The challenges of developing and using orphan medicinal products.

Authors:  James W Dear; Pajaree Lilitkarntakul; David J Webb
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Medicines for children licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA): the balance after 10 years.

Authors:  A Ceci; M Felisi; P Baiardi; F Bonifazi; M Catapano; C Giaquinto; A Nicolosi; M Sturkenboom; A Neubert; I Wong
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Rare diseases and orphan drugs.

Authors:  J K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Safety-related regulatory actions for orphan drugs in the US and EU: a cohort study.

Authors:  Harald E Heemstra; Thijs J Giezen; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Remco L A de Vrueh; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Orphan drug development is not taking off.

Authors:  Roberta Joppi; Vittorio Bertele; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Time to revisit the orphan drug law.

Authors:  Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Access to orphan drugs despite poor quality of clinical evidence.

Authors:  Alain G Dupont; Philippe B Van Wilder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Orphan drugs, orphan diseases. The first decade of orphan drug legislation in the EU.

Authors:  Roberta Joppi; Vittorio Bertele'; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.