BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bacterial infections are common complications after organ transplantation. Fluoroquinolones are frequently used for treatment because of their broad spectrum of activity; but some of them, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, are reported to increase blood concentration of ciclosporin because they are metabolised by the liver through the same enzymatic pathway, the cytochrome P450 system. This study was performed to establish whether levofloxacin, a more recent fluoroquinolone that undergoes limited hepatic metabolism, interferes with metabolism and excretion of either ciclosporin microemulsion or tacrolimus. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in two groups of renal transplant patients, on either ciclosporin or tacrolimus treatment, before and at the sixth day of treatment with levofloxacin. RESULTS: Levofloxacin significantly increased the mean area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and the other pharmacokinetic parameters of ciclosporin and tacrolimus by about 25%. The interference of levofloxacin on the hepatic metabolism of these drugs was demonstrated by the concomitant decrease by 5% of polyclonal ciclosporin concentration, which is the expression of parent drug and its metabolites. Both before and during levofloxacin treatment we observed trough concentrations of monoclonal and polyclonal ciclosporin significantly lower in the evening (C(12)) than in the morning (C(0)); this observation suggests a circadian variation in the metabolism of this drug. However, no difference between C(0) and C(12) was observed with tacrolimus, confirming its more predictable bioavailability. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that levofloxacin partially inhibits the metabolism of both ciclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus, and therefore close therapeutic monitoring of these two drugs should be recommended during levofloxacin therapy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bacterial infections are common complications after organ transplantation. Fluoroquinolones are frequently used for treatment because of their broad spectrum of activity; but some of them, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, are reported to increase blood concentration of ciclosporin because they are metabolised by the liver through the same enzymatic pathway, the cytochrome P450 system. This study was performed to establish whether levofloxacin, a more recent fluoroquinolone that undergoes limited hepatic metabolism, interferes with metabolism and excretion of either ciclosporin microemulsion or tacrolimus. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in two groups of renal transplant patients, on either ciclosporin or tacrolimus treatment, before and at the sixth day of treatment with levofloxacin. RESULTS:Levofloxacin significantly increased the mean area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and the other pharmacokinetic parameters of ciclosporin and tacrolimus by about 25%. The interference of levofloxacin on the hepatic metabolism of these drugs was demonstrated by the concomitant decrease by 5% of polyclonal ciclosporin concentration, which is the expression of parent drug and its metabolites. Both before and during levofloxacin treatment we observed trough concentrations of monoclonal and polyclonal ciclosporin significantly lower in the evening (C(12)) than in the morning (C(0)); this observation suggests a circadian variation in the metabolism of this drug. However, no difference between C(0) and C(12) was observed with tacrolimus, confirming its more predictable bioavailability. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that levofloxacin partially inhibits the metabolism of both ciclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus, and therefore close therapeutic monitoring of these two drugs should be recommended during levofloxacin therapy.
Authors: I Milanian; A J Ghods; M Mahmoudian; F Proushani-Nia; H Nejad Gashti; E Abdi; M Abbasi Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: D Capone; V De Marino; N Caso; P Stanziale; R Fontana; P Imperatore; V De Marino; N Pisanti Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Atul Humar; John Gill; Olwyn Johnston; Dean Fergusson; Andrew A House; Louise Lebel; Sandra Cockfield; S Joseph Kim; Jeff Zaltzman; Marcelo Cantarovich; Martin Karpinski; Tim Ramsay; Greg A Knoll Journal: Trials Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: John R Lee; Thangamani Muthukumar; Darshana Dadhania; Ying Taur; Robert R Jenq; Nora C Toussaint; Lilan Ling; Eric Pamer; Manikkam Suthanthiran Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lars P H Andersen; Mads U Werner; Mette M Rosenkilde; Nathja G Harpsøe; Hanne Fuglsang; Jacob Rosenberg; Ismail Gögenur Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Bruno Reigner; Susan Grange; Darren Bentley; Ludger Banken; Markus Abt; Richard Hughes; Emmanuel Scheubel; Theodor W Guentert Journal: Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.366
Authors: YuanPu Zheng; Anjali Masand; Michael Wagner; Sandip Kapur; Darshana Dadhania; Michelle Lubetzky; John Richard Lee Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2019-08-23