PURPOSE: To evaluate urinary continence after modified radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 1999 to May 2004, 110 patients with prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. In all patients, the fascia of the levator ani was preserved, and the plane between the prostate and rectum was dissected prior to cutting the urethra. A modification to the technique of apical dissection was introduced in May 2002. The modified method included cutting the urethra along a precise line between the prostate and urethra following the shape of the prostatic apex. The grade of early urinary incontinence was analyzed by using the incontinence rate (urinary incontinence volume (ml)/total urinary volume x 100 (%)). The incontinence rate was compared between the conventional and modified surgical techniques. Several other risk factors were also examined in these patients. Continence rates were analyzed among the patients over a one-year postoperative course. RESULTS: The incontinence rate on the day, the next day and 5-7 days after the removal of the urethral catheter were 18.1%, 11.2%, 6.0% in the modified group, and 36.6%, 22.5%, 12.6% in the conventional group, respectively. With the introduction of this modified method, the incontinence rate was significantly decreased (P<0.005). Complete continence rates 3 and 12 months after the operation were 81.3% and 98.3% in the modified and 60.0% and 97.8% in the conventional group. The time to regain complete continence in the modified was earlier than that in the conventional. After one-year, the rate of complete continence was similar and a satisfactory average in each group. Except for surgical techniques, no other factors were associated with a risk of incontinence statistically. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend modified apical dissection to preserve the urethral striated sphincter, which can be useful in improving the early incontinence rate and the recovery of continence.
PURPOSE: To evaluate urinary continence after modified radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 1999 to May 2004, 110 patients with prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. In all patients, the fascia of the levator ani was preserved, and the plane between the prostate and rectum was dissected prior to cutting the urethra. A modification to the technique of apical dissection was introduced in May 2002. The modified method included cutting the urethra along a precise line between the prostate and urethra following the shape of the prostatic apex. The grade of early urinary incontinence was analyzed by using the incontinence rate (urinary incontinence volume (ml)/total urinary volume x 100 (%)). The incontinence rate was compared between the conventional and modified surgical techniques. Several other risk factors were also examined in these patients. Continence rates were analyzed among the patients over a one-year postoperative course. RESULTS: The incontinence rate on the day, the next day and 5-7 days after the removal of the urethral catheter were 18.1%, 11.2%, 6.0% in the modified group, and 36.6%, 22.5%, 12.6% in the conventional group, respectively. With the introduction of this modified method, the incontinence rate was significantly decreased (P<0.005). Complete continence rates 3 and 12 months after the operation were 81.3% and 98.3% in the modified and 60.0% and 97.8% in the conventional group. The time to regain complete continence in the modified was earlier than that in the conventional. After one-year, the rate of complete continence was similar and a satisfactory average in each group. Except for surgical techniques, no other factors were associated with a risk of incontinence statistically. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend modified apical dissection to preserve the urethral striated sphincter, which can be useful in improving the early incontinence rate and the recovery of continence.