Literature DB >> 16485274

Effect of monopolar radiofrequency treatment over soft-tissue fillers in an animal model: part 2.

Peter R Shumaker1, Laura J England, Jeffrey S Dover, E Victor Ross, Robert Harford, Damian Derienzo, Melissa Bogle, Nathan Uebelhoer, Mark Jacoby, Karl Pope.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Monopolar radiofrequency (RF) treatment is used by physicians to heat skin and promote tissue tightening and contouring. Cosmetic fillers are used to soften deep facial lines and wrinkles. Patients who have had dermal fillers implanted may also benefit from or are candidates for monopolar RF skin tightening. This study examined the effect of RF treatment on various dermal filler substances. This is the second part of a two-part study. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A juvenile farm pig was injected with dermal fillers including cross-linked human collagen (Cosmoplast), polylactic acid (PLA) (Sculptra), liquid injectable silicone (Silikon 1000), calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) (Radiesse), and hyaluronic acid (Restylane). Skin injected with dermal fillers was RF-treated using a 1.5-cm2 treatment tip and treatment levels typically used in the clinical setting. Fillers were examined histologically 5 days, 2 weeks, or 1 month after treatment. Histological specimens were scored for inflammatory response, foreign body response, and fibrosis in order to assess the effect of treatment on early filler processes, such as inflammation and encapsulation.
RESULTS: Each filler substance produced a characteristic inflammatory response. No immediate thermal effect of RF treatment was observed histologically. RF treatment resulted in statistically significant increases in the inflammatory, foreign body, and fibrotic responses associated with the filler substances.
CONCLUSIONS: Monopolar RF treatment levels that are typically used in the clinical setting were employed in this animal study. RF treatment resulted in measurable and statistically significant histological changes associated with the various filler materials. Additional clinical and histological studies are required to determine the optimal timing of monopolar RF treatment and filler placement for maximal potential aesthetic outcome. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16485274     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  5 in total

1.  Targeted injection of a biocomposite material alters macrophage and fibroblast phenotype and function following myocardial infarction: relation to left ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  Jeremy R McGarvey; Sara Pettaway; James A Shuman; Craig P Novack; Kia N Zellars; Parker D Freels; Randall L Echols; Jason A Burdick; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  The efficacy, longevity, and safety of combined radiofrequency treatment and hyaluronic Acid filler for skin rejuvenation.

Authors:  Hyuk Kim; Kui Young Park; Sun Young Choi; Hyun-Ju Koh; Sun-Young Park; Won-Seok Park; Il-Hong Bae; Beom Joon Kim
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  The 10-Point Plan 2021: Updated Concepts for Improved Procedural Safety During Facial Filler Treatments.

Authors:  Izolda Heydenrych; Koenraad De Boulle; Krishan Mohan Kapoor; Dario Bertossi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-06

Review 4.  Use of calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) for facial augmentation.

Authors:  Patricio F Jacovella
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid with and without Radiofrequency for Forehead Augmentation: A Pilot Study Using Three-Dimensional Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  Moo Yeol Hyun; Seog Kyun Mun; Beom Joon Kim; Hyuk Kim; Won-Seok Park
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.444

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.