PURPOSE: Palliative care is an essential component of cancer care, and population-based research is needed to monitor its impact. Administrative databases are the cornerstone of health services research. Their limitation is that cause of death is not sufficient to readily classify decedents as terminally ill for the study of the health services they received at the end of life. The study purpose is to develop and test the validity of an algorithm allowing the classification of the decedents as dying of breast cancer (BC), using administrative data. METHODS: Validation was carried out through a chart review of 119 BC decedents extracted from hospital-based databases. This algorithm was applied to 3,384 deceased women with BC representative of the whole population. The effect of the classification by the algorithm was illustrated by the shift in the distributions of age and place of death. RESULTS: The validation showed a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 98%, and negative predictive value of 77% for the classification of women dying of BC. Of the 3,384 decedents, 2,293 were classified as dying of, and 1,091 as not dying of BC. Women dying of BC were younger, died less often at home (6.9% v 17.9%), and in chronic care institutions (4.1% v 14.8%), and more often in acute-care beds (69.9% v 57.1%). CONCLUSION: This novel way to classify decedents is conceptually based and empirically validated through chart review and impact on distribution of age and place of death.
PURPOSE: Palliative care is an essential component of cancer care, and population-based research is needed to monitor its impact. Administrative databases are the cornerstone of health services research. Their limitation is that cause of death is not sufficient to readily classify decedents as terminally ill for the study of the health services they received at the end of life. The study purpose is to develop and test the validity of an algorithm allowing the classification of the decedents as dying of breast cancer (BC), using administrative data. METHODS: Validation was carried out through a chart review of 119 BC decedents extracted from hospital-based databases. This algorithm was applied to 3,384 deceased women with BC representative of the whole population. The effect of the classification by the algorithm was illustrated by the shift in the distributions of age and place of death. RESULTS: The validation showed a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 98%, and negative predictive value of 77% for the classification of women dying of BC. Of the 3,384 decedents, 2,293 were classified as dying of, and 1,091 as not dying of BC. Women dying of BC were younger, died less often at home (6.9% v 17.9%), and in chronic care institutions (4.1% v 14.8%), and more often in acute-care beds (69.9% v 57.1%). CONCLUSION: This novel way to classify decedents is conceptually based and empirically validated through chart review and impact on distribution of age and place of death.
Authors: Eva Grunfeld; Lynn Lethbridge; Ron Dewar; Beverley Lawson; Lawrence F Paszat; Grace Johnston; Frederick Burge; Paul McIntyre; Craig C Earle Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Neetu Chawla; K Robin Yabroff; Angela Mariotto; Timothy S McNeel; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Chungsoo Kim; Seng Chan You; Jenna M Reps; Jae Youn Cheong; Rae Woong Park Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Abdulrahman Alturki; Bruno Gagnon; Kevin Petrecca; Susan C Scott; Lyne Nadeau; Nancy Mayo Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Akiko M Saito; Mary Beth Landrum; Bridget A Neville; John Z Ayanian; Craig C Earle Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Xhyljeta Luta; Maud Maessen; Matthias Egger; Andreas E Stuck; David Goodman; Kerri M Clough-Gorr Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Klazien W Matter-Walstra; Rita Achermann; Roland Rapold; Dirk Klingbiel; Andrea Bordoni; Silvia Dehler; Gernot Jundt; Isabelle Konzelmann; Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Thomas D Szucs; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Bernhard C Pestalozzi Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 4.430